CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

swiped mesh-LES

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 12, 2017, 14:09
Default swiped mesh-LES
  #1
New Member
 
antony morgan
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
nhhamidsa is on a distinguished road
hello.
i want to simulate a of flow over a 3D dynamic wind turbine airfoil. i'm using LES method for viscosity. generally i know that there is a fluctuate behaviour in lift numbers vs angle of attack.my problem is that i couldn't validate the problem with 2D study . the 3D used mesh is the swiped mesh of 2D mesh. (e.g 0.0001*chord length). the front and back surface is set to periodic. and the mesh size in the Z direction is 1. is it true that i'm used just 1 cell in the Z direction for mesh??
nhhamidsa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 14:38
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhhamidsa View Post
hello.
i want to simulate a of flow over a 3D dynamic wind turbine airfoil. i'm using LES method for viscosity. generally i know that there is a fluctuate behaviour in lift numbers vs angle of attack.my problem is that i couldn't validate the problem with 2D study . the 3D used mesh is the swiped mesh of 2D mesh. (e.g 0.0001*chord length). the front and back surface is set to periodic. and the mesh size in the Z direction is 1. is it true that i'm used just 1 cell in the Z direction for mesh??
No, you have to let a spanwise lenght Lz such that it is larger than the characteristic integral lenght scale. Using only one cell you are forcing a 2D-like case
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 15:23
Default
  #3
New Member
 
antony morgan
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
nhhamidsa is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
No, you have to let a spanwise lenght Lz such that it is larger than the characteristic integral lenght scale. Using only one cell you are forcing a 2D-like case
so why it can't validate with 2D study? i'm just used one mesh size in Z direction
and what is characteristic integral length
nhhamidsa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 15:37
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhhamidsa View Post
so why it can't validate with 2D study? i'm just used one mesh size in Z direction
and what is characteristic integral length
You can do a RANS simulation in 2D, if you perform LES it must be done in 3D
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 15:47
Default
  #5
New Member
 
antony morgan
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
nhhamidsa is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
You can do a RANS simulation in 2D, if you perform LES it must be done in 3D
as i said my simulation is 3D , and i want to do this by LES simulation. but my main question is that is it true for 1 mesh size in Z direction
nhhamidsa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 15:53
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhhamidsa View Post
as i said my simulation is 3D , and i want to do this by LES simulation. but my main question is that is it true for 1 mesh size in Z direction
No, that's false
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 17:40
Default
  #7
New Member
 
antony morgan
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
nhhamidsa is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
No, that's false
thanks dear friend
nhhamidsa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2017, 22:59
Default
  #8
New Member
 
antony morgan
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
nhhamidsa is on a distinguished road
even for very short length in Z direction (e.g 0.01 chord length)
nhhamidsa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 13, 2017, 03:03
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhhamidsa View Post
even for very short length in Z direction (e.g 0.01 chord length)
There is not enough physical extension to let a 3D field developing, thus LES would be not a physical approach.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
[ICEM] 2D hybrid mesh (unstructured mesh highly dependent on structured mesh parameters) shubham jain ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 April 10, 2017 05:03
LES Mesh Scale AS_Aero Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing 0 March 8, 2017 03:08
[snappyHexMesh] Snappyhex mesh: poor inlet mesh Swagga5aur OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 December 3, 2016 16:59
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 11:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04.