CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   second derivative temperature boundary condition in outlet (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/193002-second-derivative-temperature-boundary-condition-outlet.html)

mostanad September 15, 2017 07:47

second derivative temperature boundary condition in outlet
 
Hello my friends,
As we know in constant heat flux boundary condition, the fully developed BC in the outlet for temperature is grad(T)=grad(Tbulk)=grad(Twall)=constant. But I found in many papers that we can use the second derivative of temperature equal to zero in the outlet. At first, we know that this BC can be obtained by derivating from first relation. But is the second derivative well posed based on second order energy equation? or Is this BC means that grad(T)=constant not zero?
Thank you

FMDenaro September 15, 2017 10:18

yes, it means that n.grad T = constant along n

mostanad September 15, 2017 10:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMDenaro (Post 664476)
yes, it means that n.grad T = constant along n

Thanks Prof. Denaro. Is second derivative of temperature equal to zero valid in the outlet?

FMDenaro September 15, 2017 11:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostanad (Post 664479)
Thanks Prof. Denaro. Is second derivative of temperature equal to zero valid in the outlet?

yes, if the flow is fully developed you can assume also the second derivative of the velocity to vanish along the normal direction

mostanad September 15, 2017 11:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMDenaro (Post 664484)
yes, if the flow is fully developed you can assume also the second derivative of the velocity to vanish along the normal direction

I mean the second derivative for temperature too. If I use this BC, is my solution well-posed?

FMDenaro September 15, 2017 11:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostanad (Post 664487)
I mean the second derivative for temperature too. If I use this BC, is my solution well-posed?


Yes, it is a Neumann condition applied to the heat flux

mostanad September 15, 2017 17:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by FMDenaro (Post 664491)
Yes, it is a Neumann condition applied to the heat flux

But I think that when we have a second order differential equation we should use Bc up to one order less than the equation.so for energy equation(second order) is this rational to use zero second derivative temperature in the outlet?

FMDenaro September 15, 2017 17:20

You should still consider the BC in terms of the non-homogeneous Neumann type: you prescribe the first derivative equal to some function. At an outlet you don't know exactly this function but, for a developed flow condition, you are just assuming that this function is such to take constant the normal derivative.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26.