CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Citation Question

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By sms1424

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 10, 2017, 14:34
Default Citation Question
  #1
New Member
 
sulaiman
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 10
sms1424 is on a distinguished road
Hey Guys,

So I did some CFD on turbulent flow analysis and want to reference some of the equations I used like:

Turbulence Intensity= 0.16 Re^(-1/8)
Length Scale= 0.07* d

Also, I read somewhere in here that inlet turbulent intensity for moderate flow applications like HVAC can be assumed as 5%. Do you guys have a good reference, like a book, so I could cite these above information to?

Thank you
sms1424 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2017, 15:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,668
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
As far as I know, those two equations are from the Fluent User's Guide. Its source is not referenced in the Fluent manual. But if there is a solid reference, I would like to know. I would guess Batchelor or Shapiro. But most people know that the Reynolds stresses in pipe flows are not equal in all directions and that even k varies strongly across the dimensions of the pipe, which suggests that this result was derived from (CFD) experience.

In my opinion, turbulence intensity without a length scale attached to it is meaningless and the length scale is much more important. A fly buzzing around can just as easily generate as much turbulence intensity as a a T-rex running through a room. You can test this by running a simulation with a very high I 100 or 1000% and small L (the turbulence will decay rapidly and might not even transport anywhere) and compare it to a small I and large L.

If your problem is truly sensitive to these boundary conditions for I and L (or k and epsilon, or k and omega) then I would assume you have already put the effort into obtaining these parameters, which might even require its own CFD using BC's that you do know.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2017, 15:24
Default
  #3
New Member
 
sulaiman
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 10
sms1424 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the reply.

Actually my problem is not sensitive to these BCs, I tried to vary them and almost got same results but my professor is insisting in getting " real" reference for them instead of " fluent user's guide"
sbaffini likes this.
sms1424 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2017, 16:00
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 2,152
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 39
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
A like for your professor. I haven't it now to check, but Schlichting is where I would first look for this. It's both autoritative and wide, well worth a try.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about symmetry in Autodesk Cfd 2016 ecto Autodesk Simulation CFD 0 October 20, 2015 04:16
small question about the functionalities of topological changes in OpenFoam ngj OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 February 28, 2013 10:02
Question Re Engineering Data Source imnull ANSYS 0 March 5, 2012 13:51
internal field question - PitzDaily Case atareen64 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 26, 2011 15:26
Poisson Solver question Suresh Main CFD Forum 3 August 12, 2005 04:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:33.