CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Stencil and Boundary Treatment for Jameson, Schmidt, Turkel Scheme (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/204865-stencil-boundary-treatment-jameson-schmidt-turkel-scheme.html)

asdfasdf August 3, 2018 01:03

Stencil and Boundary Treatment for Jameson, Schmidt, Turkel Scheme
 
Hi all,


I have a few simple questions about the Jameson, Schmidt, Turkel (JST) scheme for artificial dissipation. I am writing a 2d solver similar to the one in the original paper and I just wan to have a few things clarified. The original paper can be found here: https://www.researchgate.net/publica...epping_Schemes

I am only confused of the artificial dissipation terms. I understand the central differencing of the flux vectors.
Consider a 2d structured domain similar to the one in the paper, using central differencing:


The a paper makes it seem like I need a 5 point stencil in both the i and j directions (see equations 11 and 12). Is this correct?


Do I need 2 layers of ghost cells at the boundaries, or should boundaries be treated differently than interior cells?


Can anybody recommend any artificial schemes that us a more compact stencil?


Does anybody have any simple codes that successfully use the JST scheme?





Thanks for any help you can provide!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12.