CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

LES/SAS question

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 1, 2018, 10:27
Default LES/SAS question
  #1
Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 9
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I'm trying to refine a mesh to fulfil the following criteria:
y+ <=1
Dx+ <=50
Dy+ <50

This is for a SAS/LES simulation.
It's the first time I'm dabbling into higher order methods,p reviously I've only used RANS.
Whilist I know how to get y+ , I'm confused about how I can get DX+/x+ , Dz+/z+?
Could someone explain this for me in simple terms please?
and is there a way to get the Dx+ and Dz+ from y+?

Many Thanks,
Tom
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2018, 11:29
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom.opt View Post
Hi,
I'm trying to refine a mesh to fulfil the following criteria:
y+ <=1
Dx+ <=50
Dy+ <50

This is for a SAS/LES simulation.
It's the first time I'm dabbling into higher order methods,p reviously I've only used RANS.
Whilist I know how to get y+ , I'm confused about how I can get DX+/x+ , Dz+/z+?
Could someone explain this for me in simple terms please?
and is there a way to get the Dx+ and Dz+ from y+?

Many Thanks,
Tom



From the definition of y+ = u_tau*y/ni you can deduce as counterpart a general expression


h+=u_tau*h/ni=(u_tau*L/ni)*h/L = Re_tau*h/L
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2018, 11:40
Default
  #3
Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 9
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
From the definition of y+ = u_tau*y/ni you can deduce as counterpart a general expression


h+=u_tau*h/ni=(u_tau*L/ni)*h/L = Re_tau*h/L
Thanks for your answer.

what's h/h+ ? I'm confused
or do you mean h would be x/z?

and if that's the case I guesss my question is how do you calculate x, z?
I know that y is the near wall distance but I don't understand how x or z would be calculated from my solution.
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2018, 11:43
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom.opt View Post
Thanks for your answer.

what's h/h+ ? I'm confused
or do you mean h would be x/z?

and if that's the case I guesss my question is how do you calculate x, z?
I know that y is the near wall distance but I don't understand how x or z would be calculated from my solution.



Yes, h is for a generic step size in x or z direction. Therefore, given you computational (dimensional) steps dx and dz, knowing the value of Re_tau, using the reference lenght L you get dx+ and dz+.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2018, 07:29
Default
  #5
Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 9
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
Yes, h is for a generic step size in x or z direction. Therefore, given you computational (dimensional) steps dx and dz, knowing the value of Re_tau, using the reference lenght L you get dx+ and dz+.
Could you explain how do I get dx, dz ? I'm still a bit lost
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2018, 08:00
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom.opt View Post
Could you explain how do I get dx, dz ? I'm still a bit lost
For example, if you want dx+=30

Re_tau*dx/L=30 -> dx= ... in meters
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2018, 09:01
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
When you run RANS, your first cell thickness is some length (say 0.01 mm) and that gives you a certain wall y+ of let's say 2. Btw, y+ is a global coordinate system (not just next to walls). x+ and z+ work the same way. x+, y+, and z+ are special Reynolds numbers.

So in order to achieve a wall y+ of 1 in LES, you would want a near wall spacing of 0.01mm / 2 = 0.005 mm.

Therefore to achieve Dx+ <= 50, you would need a spacing in x direction of 50*0.005 mm = 0.25 mm. And the same for y-direction. Difference is in y you have two criteria, a core mesh criteria for your LES (Dy+ < 50) and a near wall criteria for your wall models (which you call y+ < 50 but really it's another Dy+ < 1 because you're just talking about cell sizes)

Btw a nearly identical question was asked here with the same confusion. Is there some epidemic going around?
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2018, 09:11
Default
  #8
Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 9
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
When you run RANS, your first cell thickness is some length (say 0.01 mm) and that gives you a certain wall y+ of let's say 2. Btw, y+ is a global coordinate system (not just next to walls). x+ and z+ work the same way. x+, y+, and z+ are special Reynolds numbers.

So in order to achieve a wall y+ of 1 in LES, you would want a near wall spacing of 0.01mm / 2 = 0.005 mm.

Therefore to achieve Dx+ <= 50, you would need a spacing in x direction of 50*0.005 mm = 0.25 mm. And the same for y-direction. Difference is in y you have two criteria, a core mesh criteria for your LES (Dy+ < 50) and a near wall criteria for your wall models (which you call y+ < 50 but really it's another Dy+ < 1 because you're just talking about cell sizes)

Btw a nearly identical question was asked here with the same confusion. Is there some epidemic going around?
Perfect thanks.
This is the best explanation I got so far. I get it now.
I think the problem is that all the books and links I visited are unable to explain concepts in simple terms and make LES hardly accessible for a novice.
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2018, 11:18
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,768
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom.opt View Post
Perfect thanks.
This is the best explanation I got so far. I get it now.
I think the problem is that all the books and links I visited are unable to explain concepts in simple terms and make LES hardly accessible for a novice.

Maybe your confusion is due to the fact that dx+ and dz+ are just two numbers resulting from the adopted grid size while y+ is a function of the distance from the wall, not a single value.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about symmetry in Autodesk Cfd 2016 ecto Autodesk Simulation CFD 0 October 20, 2015 04:16
small question about the functionalities of topological changes in OpenFoam ngj OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 February 28, 2013 10:02
Question Re Engineering Data Source imnull ANSYS 0 March 5, 2012 13:51
internal field question - PitzDaily Case atareen64 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 26, 2011 15:26
Poisson Solver question Suresh Main CFD Forum 3 August 12, 2005 04:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32.