CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

turbulence in turbulence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 6, 2000, 07:01
Default turbulence in turbulence
Posts: n/a
hi .. i am a novice inCFD.. i am modelling flow using k-e model for turbulence. in the standard k-e model equations( 2D), how can one integrate the rate of production of k or e terms over the control volume. i am integrating FVintegration over 2D space? 2) what can one take the relation for mixing length for flow over variable x-area with many internal obstructions? 3)we have two different k-e model equations for low Re and high Re. how high or low should be this Re value for the use of respective equations?
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2000, 09:43
Default Re: turbulence in turbulence
John C. Chien
Posts: n/a
(1). The volume is always 3-D, so, make the thickness equal to unit thickness. (2). If you are using mixing length, you need to know the distribution of it in the flow field. You can specify the mixing length distribution or you can use a model to calculate it. (that is your job) (3). As long as the universal log-law portion of the velocity profile exists, you can always use the high Reynolds number model.(sublayer region excluded) (4). You can always use the low Reynolds number model for the whole flow field, any Reynolds number. So, you can not use the high Reynolds number model for the laminar and the transitional flow range. (it is the flow behavior associated with the Reynolds number, not the value of the Reynolds number itself.)
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2000, 03:18
Default Re: turbulence in turbulence
Jonas Bredberg
Posts: n/a

low-Re and high-Re turbulence models could be a bit confusing a first. This Reynolds number is not related to the bulk Reynolds number, but rather a local Reynolds number. Generally a low-Re turbulence model needs to resolve the flowfield even in the viscous sublayer, while a high-Re turbulence model is satisfied with placing the first interior calculation node in the logarithmic layer. The different regions are normally distinguished using a normalised wall distance, y^+=yu_{\tau}/\nu, where u_{\tau} is the friction velocity (u_{\tau}=\sqrt(\tau_w/\rho), \tau_w is the wall friction), y is the wall normal distance, and \nu being the kinematic viscosity. The viscous sublayer is below y^+=5, and using a low-Re turbulence model you need a number of nodes in this region, with the first below y^+=1. The logarithmic region starts at around y^+=30.

Regards Jonas
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence postprocessing Mohsin FLUENT 2 October 3, 2016 14:18
Question on Turbulence Intensity Eric FLUENT 1 March 7, 2012 05:30
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52
Code release: Flow Transition and Turbulence Chaoqun Liu Main CFD Forum 0 September 26, 2008 17:15

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:42.