CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Can NACA 4-series airfoil have decimal representation??

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By sbaffini
  • 2 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 16, 2020, 05:27
Post Can NACA 4-series airfoil have decimal representation??
  #1
Senior Member
 
Vino
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 9
Vino is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

In NACA 4-series airfoil, for example NACA-2412 has maximum camber of 2% located 40% (0.4 chords) from the leading edge with a maximum thickness of 12% of the chord.

In case, a NACA airfoil has a maximum camber of 2.5% located 45% (0.45 chords) from the leading edge with a maximum thickness of 12.5% of the chord, how to represent this condition? Can I represent as NACA 2.5 4.5 12.5 with decimals instead of integer ? I'm facing this issue while doing airfoil optimization & I'm not clear how to represent this.

Thanks a lot for your clarification in advance.!!!
Vino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2020, 07:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,276
Blog Entries: 19
Rep Power: 30
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
Well, nobody is getting you to jail if you do, if this what you want to know.

Jokes apart, there are two points here:

1) Does the 4 digits formula keep working if they become decimal? That is, will they still provide a set of points that can be used to define an airfoil or, at least, a sort of? I never tried, but you can very easily.

2) If 1 applies, would be a decimal formula still useful if, say, it turns out that the relative profile is the optimum you were searching for? Unless your chaintool is somehow weird enough to be bounded to the 4 digit series, I think this is another yes.

In conclusion, I think that as long as that formula keeps working in producing a realistic profile for your intended use, you can keep using it even with decimal digits.
Vino likes this.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 24, 2020, 14:30
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 4,021
Rep Power: 48
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Go for it.

The NACA airfoil designation would be akin to "nomenclature" if it were in a paper today. It works for the specific paper. It clearly doesn't work for everyone.

You can't take this designation too seriously. Keep in mind the last two digits (the maximum thickness) aren't even exact when you punch them into the formula, but only an approximate thickness. E.g. a NACA 0320 has a max thickness of 20.006. Similar (small) inaccuracies you can find in the 1st and 2nd digits.

It is not uncommon for folks to modify the NACA family.
The Lockheed S-3 Viking has published airfoil sections: NACA 0016.3-1.03 32.7/100 at the root and NACA 0012-1.10 40/1.00 at the tip. The 0016.3 is for a 16.3% max thickness. These are severe modifications from the original NACA family nowhere mentioned in the original publication. No one us sueing Lockheed for deviating from the NACA formula.


Modifying the 1st and 2nd digits is not that aesthetically pleasing but I wouldn't worry about it. It is bound to happen in any optimization work. You might want to find creative ways of presenting the parameters, that's all.
sbaffini and Vino like this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ffd_control_point_2d feiyi SU2 4 September 30, 2019 12:42
High drag for airfoil compared to XFOIL and wind tunnel data Ry10 SU2 15 October 30, 2016 17:27
2D FFD Optimization RLangtry SU2 2 August 5, 2014 09:48
SU2 AOA optimization 454514566@qq.com SU2 8 July 7, 2014 07:01
Problem with airfoil shape optimization robyTKD SU2 Shape Design 6 June 13, 2013 19:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35.