CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Bechmarking CFD codes

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2000, 10:07
Default Bechmarking CFD codes
Posts: n/a

My company is interested in purchasing a piece of CFD software. We are mainly interested in the three products: Fluent, Star-CD and CFX. Is anyone aware of, if any benchmarking has been performed, between those three products with respect to solver speed. I would expect, that the result of such a benchmark depends greatly on the problem which is solved, but still it would be nice to have some numbers.


  Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2000, 11:26
Default Re: Bechmarking CFD codes
John C. Chien
Posts: n/a
(1). It does not make sense to know the solver's speed, without knowing the problem to be solved. (2). For simple problems, it shouldn't matter which code to use. For complex problems, in most cases, I don't even know whether a particular run will give me a converged solution or not. (3). This is my everyday experience. I have to monitor the solution and constantly adjust the parameters (relaxation factors or time steps) in order to guide the solution to a converged state. Sometimes the solution diverges in one step, sometimes in the middle of iterations. (4). And there will be many other issues, like the time involved in geometry and mesh generation, post processing time to look at the result, and the re-meshing time to improve the mesh and the solution, etc.... (5). I would strongly suggest that (a). visit the vendors's website first (it's free, but it will cost you time), and make your own judgement in terms of your applications. Most people don't want to tell others what he is going to do with the code. (b). ask the vendor to supply you the information you need, (c). ask the vendor to benchmark your problem. or get a demo disk to run your problem on your own. (6). I can only say that 99% of time, I am getting the wrong results, in terms of the mesh generation, and solutions. It is easier to use a faster computer than to find a faster code. A general cfd code is always relatively slow when compared with the specialized design code. (7). So, make sure that the code you are going to buy can solve your problem in the first place.(especially the solution you like. )
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2000, 12:15
Default Re: Bechmarking CFD codes
Clinton Lafferty
Posts: n/a
I would suggest the following paper. It details the pros and cons of several commerical codes available; however, it is 5 years old. I have been looking for any follow-ups.

Perspective: Selected Benchmarks From Commerical CFD Codes. Journal of Fluids Engineering. June 1995. Vol. 117. pp208-218.

An extended abstract can be found through the ASME website.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD Salary CFD Main CFD Forum 17 January 3, 2017 18:09
CFD codes and books: need your opinion Giovanni Mattarolo Main CFD Forum 3 February 4, 2006 23:52
Comparison of CFD Codes Kerem Main CFD Forum 9 May 9, 2003 04:29
New List of Free CFD Codes Bert Laney Main CFD Forum 5 September 15, 1999 15:24
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54.