# Potential Flow : Laminar or Turbulent

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 24, 2000, 02:56 Potential Flow : Laminar or Turbulent #1 Brindaban Ghosh Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links For potential flow, viscous force term is identically zero. Therefore, Reynolds number is automaticallly infinite. Therefore, whether potential flow is laminar or turbulent.

 June 24, 2000, 04:02 Re: Potential Flow : Laminar or Turbulent #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). The Reynolds number is associated with the viscous terms as (1/Re). (2). So, as Re goes to infinity, (1/Re) goes to zero. In this case, it is still called high RE number flow. This is because, the corresponding boundary layer thickness will goes to zero in the limit. But it is still there. (3). If we drop the viscous terms all together from the equation, then, physically, the effects of viscous terms disappear. They are not there any more from the begining. (as far as the equation is concern) (4). In the equation, where the viscous terms are no longer there, is call inviscid equation. You don't have the viscous terms, so you don't have the Reynolds number. It can be Euler equation, or full potential equation or linearlized potential equation. You can't attach the Reynold number to these equations. (5). So, the flow with Reynolds number goes to infinity is still considered as viscous flow, because the boundary condition is still the non-slip condition. (6). On the other hand, in the inviscid equations, the boundary condition must be slip condition with flow parallel to the wall locally. (7). So, it must be either the inviscid flow, the laminar viscous flow, or the turbulent viscous flow.(that is, laminar flow = laminar viscous flow)

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Chetan Kadakia FLUENT 27 December 8, 2012 06:08 nikhil FLUENT 5 February 1, 2011 11:42 3kha Main CFD Forum 3 January 31, 2011 22:31 BJ Main CFD Forum 2 December 19, 2003 11:39 Atholl Main CFD Forum 12 September 4, 2002 11:14