CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Mesh Convergence for Turbulence Model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 28, 2020, 11:37
Default Mesh Convergence for Turbulence Model
  #1
New Member
 
Maksim
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Eicosane is on a distinguished road
Greetings, everyone!

I'm testing the implementation of the k-ε-a-b turbulence model [For example decribed here]. For this purpose i've written a 1D CFD solver, which uses finite volume method with Godunov-type scheme for subset of hyperbolic equations and implicit linear scheme for subset of parabolic equations.

As a test case i had tried to run Poggi experiment on Richtmyer–Meshkov instability [Some examples of such calculus], but faced some troubles. When i'm trying to run such task with only artificial (but rather big, about 1000 times as much as normal for gases) viscosity, diffusion coefficient and heat conductivity, i.e. just a Navier-Stokes system of equations without tubulence model, solution coverges rather well with mesh refinement. Both in time dependence of mixing zone width and, for example, temperature at the end of the calculation (2.5 ms).

But when i'm trying to include turbulence, results begin to show great dependence on the mesh. Turbulent viscosity varies from case to case, and decrease significantly with mesh refinement. As a result mixing zone width after reshock also strongly depends on mesh and decrease when a try more detailed meshes.

How can i achieve convergence of the solution with turbulence model?

Thanks for any help!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg NS_mix_width.jpg (85.1 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg NS_T.jpg (65.8 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg Turb_visc.jpg (71.1 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg Turb_width.jpg (113.3 KB, 12 views)

Last edited by Eicosane; July 28, 2020 at 18:20. Reason: Added graphics.
Eicosane is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2020, 08:08
Default Rough solution
  #2
New Member
 
Maksim
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
Eicosane is on a distinguished road
The problem seems to be connected with deviatoric part of Reynolds stress tensor in source terms of k (and eps) equation. The only way to deal with it i've found so far - is simply to bound this source term (highlighted by red frame) by the maximum value of 2E8 J/m^3/s in k equation (and proportionally in eps equation). By this convergence of mixing zone width seems to be significantly improved.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Turb_width_1.jpg (91.3 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg k_equation_3.jpg (24.7 KB, 3 views)
Eicosane is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 03:19
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes thomasnwalshiii OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 18 December 19, 2015 18:57
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids ashtonJ CFX 6 August 11, 2014 14:32
2 stage axial turbine model convergence issues sherifkadry CFX 2 September 7, 2009 20:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:40.