|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Is the resulting set of discretised equations for a general CFD problem nonlinear? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Hi, I was just wondering this while reading up about it: As far as I understand, the PDEs/Navier-Stokes equations in each cell are discretised via different schemes and then solved iteratively in a huge system of equations (matrix). From this, you get the mass, momentum, temperature, pressure etc. in each cell, and you use those to calculate new source terms, densities etc. for the next iteration.
Now, my question is the following: Is the resulting equation system that Fluent/OF/whatever solver solves linear, due to the discretisation schemes being used? In other words, are nonlinear equation system solvers necessary for the solution of a CFD problem? Cheers, Baum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,063
Rep Power: 75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Generally the resulting discrete equations are linearized in some way but the NSE are non-linear and the discrete equations can be non-linear, too. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Hi Filippo, thanks for the reply. Of course the NSE are non-linear, but if I choose a simple first order discretisation scheme, shouldn't the whole system become linearised based on their neighbouring cells? Are there some equations that will always remain nonlinear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,063
Rep Power: 75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Wouldn't be a first order upwind still non-linear for an implicit method? Think about that for the simple 1D Burgers equation, you will see that the first order scheme is still non-linear. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Well, here it shows that I definitely need to read up again on these things. Do you mean that due to the uČ staying in the equation even after first-order discretisation, the equation stays non-linear? If that's it, it makes sense to me. I think I mixed up the linear interpolation of the face values with the linearity of the equations themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,063
Rep Power: 75 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Remeshing for Rotation in CFX via ICEMCFD | gera | CFX | 3 | September 23, 2017 13:29 |
| CFD Salary | CFD | Main CFD Forum | 17 | January 3, 2017 18:09 |
| How to assign the inlet B.C using a bunch of data set for an unsteady problem? | ali8500 | CFX | 3 | March 28, 2012 19:41 |
| Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
| CFD - Trends and Perspectives | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 16 | August 7, 1998 17:27 |