|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there, is there a fundamental difference between the Finite Volume Method (FVM) and the Finite Element Method (FEM)? I don't mean the difference of software packages, I am more interested in the effects of the different equation formulations. Can one say that i.e. deformations of a fluid particle in FEM (e.g. in a wake) are generally greater thus resulting in slightly shorter separation distances than in the identical FVM-formulation? Are there specific fluid problems that are better handled by FEM than by FVM? Thank you for your help. Uve
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [ICEM] Negative Volumes & 7 node HEXA elements | mr_stoked | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | September 21, 2010 13:45 |
| Finite Elements vs Finite Difference Vs Finite Volumes | T3rmInAt0r | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 9, 2010 15:00 |
| sliding mesh with Finite elements or finite volume | tool | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 9, 2008 11:07 |
| Finite volumes vs. finite elements: applications | Lionel S. | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 22, 2007 11:51 |
| CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |