Pipe flow heat transfer

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 11, 2020, 11:31 Pipe flow heat transfer #1 New Member   Mateja Join Date: Jan 2020 Posts: 15 Rep Power: 2 Hello, For calculating heat transfer in laminar, incompressible pipe flow, I am using PISO with NS and energy equation. As a solution to energy equation, I see heat is transferred due to diffusion only. There is no convection (though convection term is included in the energy equation) observed in the flow. I tried increasing Reynolds number and Prandtl number still no effect. The boundary conditions for temperature are: T = 20C at the Inlet, T = 0 at the output and Neumann BC for temperature on the walls. The graph I got is a linear drop in temperature. Any one can help ?

 September 15, 2020, 06:14 #2 Senior Member     Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 1,321 Blog Entries: 19 Rep Power: 30 The outlet boundary condition for your case is wrong but the convection scheme is taking care of it. As there is no transversal difference in temperature (Neumann at the walls), the axial propagation is the only one that matters, but only the diffusion can sense the outlet bc. Also, flow is probably fully developed and laminar, so the convection effects at the interior (which are nonetheless present) are negligible, even in the developing zone. Mateja likes this.

September 15, 2020, 06:19
#3
New Member

Mateja
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 2
Quote:
 Originally Posted by sbaffini The outlet boundary condition for your case is wrong but the convection scheme is taking care of it. As there is no transversal difference in temperature (Neumann at the walls), the axial propagation is the only one that matters, but only the diffusion can sense the outlet bc. Also, flow is probably fully developed and laminar, so the convection effects at the interior (which are nonetheless present) are negligible, even in the developing zone.

Thank you so much for your reply. What should be the outlet condition then? Neuman at the outlet too?

 September 15, 2020, 06:21 #4 Senior Member     Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 1,321 Blog Entries: 19 Rep Power: 30 Typically yes, but with Neumann at walls you are not going to see anything. So, the question is, what do you want to study in the first place?

 September 15, 2020, 06:26 #5 New Member   Mateja Join Date: Jan 2020 Posts: 15 Rep Power: 2 I want to analyze the heat transfer due to convection/diffusion in a channel(cartesian coordinates) and in a tube (axisymmetric coordinates). As there is no heat generation and removal, therefore insulated walls are considered. With the same boundary conditions, Neumann at the walls, Dirichlet at the inlet/Outlet, Fluent gives correct profile and considers heat transfer due to convection but in Fortran only diffusion is observed.

 September 15, 2020, 06:55 #6 Senior Member     Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 1,321 Blog Entries: 19 Rep Power: 30 Correct here is really a misnomer because the outlet bc is not exactly well posed. However, let's put things in order. For steady, incompressible flows, temperature is just a transported scalar. I assume that your flow part is correctly solved. I also guess you are using a constant velocity profile at inlet, so that the two cases (channel and pipe) will have slightly different flow development zones and fully developed profiles. I am sure that Fluent can correctly solve this case but, in Fluent, you are not free to use an outlet bc and also assign a temperature (backflow temperature is used only in certain cases that are supposed to not be present at convergence here). So, first question first, what conditions/schemes are you using in Fluent? Second question: what schemes are you using in your Fortran code? Do they match the Fluent ones, at least roughly? Third question: is your Fortran code solving the flow part correctly? Considering your case, you seem to then be interested in a pseudo 1D case, where the difference between channel and pipe is only due to the different profiles and development zones (which, however, I expect to be quite similar). However, a constant temperature profile and Neumann at walls, really imply that temperature just behaves as a 1D field because, assuming a sufficiently long channel/pipe, the transversal velocity is non negligible only in the development zone where the temperature is uniform, with no practical effect on it. This brings the fourth question: What sort of convective effects do you see in Fluent? A temperature profile at a given section (as opposed to a constant profile at the same section) or the classical effect you see in the 1D steady, convection-diffusion equation?

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post PabloXX37 System Analysis 0 November 20, 2019 10:46 saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 06:21 MichaelK CFX 12 September 1, 2016 06:15 feedq FLUENT 10 November 26, 2014 09:23 Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 07:28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top