CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Proper validation of Turbulent Intensity.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 12, 2020, 05:43
Default Proper validation of Turbulent Intensity.
  #1
Senior Member
 
Arijit Saha
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 132
Rep Power: 7
ari003 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone, my query is related to the Turbulent intensity of a channel flow. It might sound very basic but the solution is not properly available anywhere so if anyone is intended to help it will be my pleasure.
The TI is defined as the ratio of standard deviation of the fluctuation to the mean velocity.
Quote:
TI=u'rms/U(mean)
Method 1
Quote:
t(sec) U(m/s) V W
1 12.1 2.5 1.5
2 10.5 2.2 1.7
3 11.4 2.8 1.5
....
10 10.8 2.6 1.9
If the above just represents a probe data for each velocity component I can find the TI by calculating the fluctuation(U-U(mean)) and then do the rms of the fluctuation and then putting in the above equation. From there I can find the TI(u-comp), TI(v-comp) and TI(w-comp). Does this makes sense?

Method 2
Quote:
TI=sqrt(2/3k)/U
k=1/3[( u_x'^2 + u_y'^2 + u_z'^2 )] where these are the Reynolds Normal stress.
I also have the values of these stresses from OpenFoam from where I can calculate the k and eventually the TI where U here are three mean velocity components U_x, U_y and U_z.
U =sqrt{U_x^2 + U_y^2 + U_z^2}

So from the method 2 I can find the overall TI and not for each component right?
How can I validate that the TI generated through method 2 is completely accurate and that even through method 1?
ari003 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2020, 13:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,674
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by ari003 View Post
How can I validate that the TI generated through method 2 is completely accurate and that even through method 1?

Just use algebra and you can establish the equivalency between 1 and 2. All you need to do is write out u'rms, v'rms, and w'rms and just look and see that the same terms are appearing in the other formula.

But k should be half the trace of the Reynolds stresses. I'm not sure why you have 1/3, maybe a typo.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulent kinetic Intensity greater than 100% FlorianM FLUENT 13 January 23, 2019 07:51
Turbulent intensity and turbulent dissipation Phil FLUENT 2 February 14, 2018 05:06
fractional intensity and turbulent intensity in CFX Nick R CFX 1 April 6, 2013 11:23
Question regarding Reynolds Number and Turbulent Intensity maxj Main CFD Forum 4 March 5, 2013 06:16
what is turbulent intensity? LG.P FLUENT 2 February 12, 2002 10:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:02.