CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Semi-automatic 2D structured grid generation is possible (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/237025-semi-automatic-2d-structured-grid-generation-possible.html)

aerosayan June 26, 2021 14:45

Semi-automatic 2D structured grid generation is possible
 
3 Attachment(s)
I have a good enough 2D structured solver. However, there aren't much OpenSource tools that allow easy grid generation like in ICEM-CFD or Pointwise.

GMSH is amazing, however we need to write a fairly complex input file for any non-standard case.

Looking at some images of CFD domains attached, it dawned on me that it is possible to create a semi-automatic 2D structured grid generator. Of course the grid generated will be in multiple blocks. I have a rudimentary AMR system in development, that will adaptively refine the grid blocks in levels. The AMR system refinement would look like the first picture.

I want to hear some counter points before I dive into this.

Why do you think it might be difficult or even not possible?

arjun June 26, 2021 15:43

Give me your email, I will send you something in the direction you are looking in.

I have also written (not completely) something something simple to generate simple 2d meshes for wildkatze.

Since it was not completely finished it was not formally released.

aerosayan June 26, 2021 16:49

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by arjun (Post 806938)
Give me your email, I will send you something in the direction you are looking in.

I have also written (not completely) something something simple to generate simple 2d meshes for wildkatze.

Since it was not completely finished it was not formally released.


Really appreciate it. I sent you my email in private message. Thanks!!


My current idea is from the time I was making an advancing front triangulation algorithm for [redacted], but realized that handling multiple bodies is insanely difficult, because of the presence of multiple holes in the domain. Then I realized, I could partition the domain in such a way, there would be no holes, and the algorithm would work well.


The results worked out well.

arjun June 26, 2021 17:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerosayan (Post 806940)
Really appreciate it. I sent you my email in private message. Thanks!!


My current idea is from the time I was making an advancing front triangulation algorithm for [redacted], but realized that handling multiple bodies is insanely difficult, because of the presence of multiple holes in the domain. Then I realized, I could partition the domain in such a way, there would be no holes, and the algorithm would work well.


The results worked out well.



https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~quake/triangle.html


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:40.