|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Shravana
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi all! I have conducted an ICFD analysis of a 3 mm cooling channel using a Steady-State Solver. The image below is the fluid pressure result for boundary conditions: Inlet velocity = 1195.586 mm/s and Outlet pressure = 0 MPa.
As seen here, the pressure results are not consistent especially in the region near the inlet and the outlet. Can anyone help me recognize what could the reason be for this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Guven Nergiz
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Turkey
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Do you map the pressure values to Ls-Dyna mesh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Shravana
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
No, I did not map any pressure values. This result is based on the boundary conditions only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Guven Nergiz
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Turkey
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Because it looks LS-Dyna Pre-Post, maybe this is the problem. Otherwise I think its about the mesh...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Shravana
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Yes, it is LS-Dyna but I did not map any pressure values. I have refined the mesh to 0.25 mm element size.
I have investigated a simple cylinder too and it gives me correct results. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| cfd, cooling, pressure |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Correct pressure distribution but wrong aerodynamics coefficients | Aerospace | OpenFOAM | 11 | December 12, 2012 06:05 |
| Neumann pressure BC and velocity field | Antech | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 25, 2006 03:15 |
| Pressure distribution over an airfoil-help | Andrew Parker | FLUENT | 4 | February 13, 2002 12:51 |
| Effects of gravity in pipe - pressure distribution | Anthony Wachs | FLUENT | 2 | July 25, 2001 08:07 |
| Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |