CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

PMARC-12 Neumann Patches

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 2, 2000, 18:21
Default PMARC-12 Neumann Patches
R. Harris
Posts: n/a

I have some PMARC-12 questions that I was hoping somebody could help me with.

1) My first problem is with using Neumann patches as lifting surfaces. As a test case I performed a run with a single rectangular planform lifting surface with an aspect ratio of 6 and an angle of attack of 10 degrees. Several things seem wrong with my results. First, the wake doublets all have zero strength. I ran the code in the debugger and it appears that the wake doublet strength is calculated in subroutine WAKDUB by subtracting the "upper" and "lower" trailing edge body doublet strengths as described in the users guide and elsewhere. The problem is that subroutine WAKINIT seems to assign the same panel index for both the upper and lower body panels along the wake separation line for Neumann patches. The result is that the doublet strengths cancel. Is this a known problem with the code or am I using it improperly? I can provide my input files if that helps. The other problem is that the lift coefficient seems to be a strong function of the direction which the surface normal is pointed. Any thoughts on these two points would be greatly appreciated.

2) I've been running some "thick" NACA 4 digit series symmetric airfoil sections with the same planform and angle of attack. The lift coefficient seems to be a much stronger function of foil thickness than I would expect from looking at, say, 2-D section coefficient data from Abbot and Von-Doenhoff. Why is this?


Rick Harris
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[blockMesh] Default patches not appearing in paraview ozzythewise OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 9 September 22, 2017 10:51
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 wyldckat OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 3 September 8, 2010 07:25
[snappyHexMesh] internal faces between patches created with snappyHexMesh romant OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 August 17, 2009 09:40
Courant number, patches, etc oort OpenFOAM 1 July 24, 2009 19:05
radiation patches, viewfactors beams Siemens 1 March 12, 2009 08:39

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:44.