CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

FLUENT- your opinion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 8, 2000, 05:35
Default FLUENT- your opinion
Posts: n/a
Dear Friends:

As my Institute is planning to purchase a PC-based CFD code may I seek your opinion on FLUENT/ PHOENICS and beyond
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2000, 09:09
Default Re: FLUENT- your opinion
mehdi ben elhadj
Posts: n/a

PHOENICS is the best.

Parabolic, Hyperbolic Or Elliptic Numerical Integration Code Series.

I use it every day.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2000, 11:29
Default Re: FLUENT- your opinion
John C. Chien
Posts: n/a
(1). The purpose of the purchase is one of the factor you need to consider. In other words, it it the relationship between your institute and the code. Since you did not specify the purpose, it is hard to make a good suggestion. (2). PHOENICS has been around for a long time, and it has a royal brand of Imperial College school of thinking. It is also easier to find the related publications on the technical journals. I have not used the code directly, but friends around me have used the code many years ago. (then, it was the only code available.) So, this code has closer relationship with the academic institutions. (3). Fluent has gone through two stage of development. In early days, everyone was doing the same thing, the pressure based, structured mesh. So, it was in the same category as the other code. In mid-90's, the UNS for the unstructured mesh beame available and it makes the complex geometry easier to handle. But it also comes with the disadvantage of using the tri/tet mesh near the wall. So, the wall type flow problem could not be handled accurately due to the presence of the wall boundary layer,which requires the boundary layer type coordinates. (4). Thing has gradually changed and improved in the near wall area, and the hybrid mesh was then available. This in principle can solve the wall layer problem, but in reality, hybrid mesh is rather complex, relative to the structured boundary layer hex/quad mesh. (5). So, you can learn different things from different codes. (the disadvantage of using commercial code is that it will give you the illusion the the fluid dynamics problems can be solved by running the code which tends to supress the desire to create something new.) The principle is: if you always follow somebody, you will always lagging behind. Other than that, you are free to look at every or all cfd codes available. you learn more that way.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2000, 12:19
Default Re: FLUENT- your opinion
Posts: n/a
We've been using FLUENT on the PC at my company since 1995. We investigated many available programs while selecting a code in 1995, and found that may couldn't properly solve our particular class of problem (buoyancy flows through porous media with small velocities and large length scales). The bottom line is that you have to tailor the CFD code to the intended application.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2000, 12:56
Default Re: FLUENT- your opinion
Kai Kang
Posts: n/a
It really depends on what you want to use it for. I don't know about Phenics, but I've using Fluent for quite a long time. Fluent runs almost perfect on UNIX workstations, but on PC, I would say about 75-80% as good as on UNIX.

For educational purpose, I would recommend you get the older version of Fluent v4.X as well, which only supports structured grid, and for simple problems, you can generated the mesh and solve all in Fluent (now in Fluent 5, you need Gambit for the model).

Otherwise Fluent5 & Gambit is the choice.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Problem of Fluent Interpreted UDF: parse error knight Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 12 March 5, 2016 02:26
Fluent jobs through pbs ibnkureshi FLUENT 5 June 9, 2011 13:43
Compared MRFSimpleFoam and Fluent in a centrifugal pump! renyun0511 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 July 6, 2010 06:24
Fluent 12.0 is worst then Fluent 6.2 herntan FLUENT 5 December 14, 2009 03:57
Problems in lauching FLUENT Lourival FLUENT 3 January 16, 2008 17:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:53.