Different answer on same algorithm in python and c++ - Page 2 -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

January 13, 2023, 14:30

#21

FMDenaro

Senior Member

Filippo Maria Denaro

Join Date: Jul 2010

Posts: 7,048

Rep Power: 75

Quote:

Originally Posted by siamak

@sbaffini
Thanks for your answer
I think You got the point, I tried to check the L1 and L2, but it seems after some iterations it goes behind my machine's precision. I have to check it more carefully to be sure about it.

To be honest, I suspect the issue is in some other part of youre codes.

On the other hand, you can also code a simple matrix-vector product using a "1.0" entry for all and compare C++ and python results.

siamak likes this.

Page 2 of 2

Tags

c++ code, numerical computation, python code

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Error in enabling the python wrapper	Jinn	SU2 Installation	2	April 23, 2022 14:52
[PyFoam] Using pyFoamPlotWatcher.py To Plot Residuals	m_ridzon	OpenFOAM Community Contributions	22	January 26, 2021 19:48
Running Fluent from Python: UDF Compilation problems	Ames	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	5	November 16, 2020 07:12
PISO algorithm instability in Python	Nduna	Main CFD Forum	1	March 15, 2016 09:26
[OpenFOAM] paraview v4 - building with python - OF2.3.0, PVv4, Python 2.7	aylalisa	ParaView	4	June 13, 2014 09:52

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:53.