CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Quesions Simple

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 30, 2000, 04:01
Default Quesions Simple
Posts: n/a

I have some quires, which appear to be simple, but yet unanswered.

1. If the fluid motion equations weren't based on the assumption that normal and shearing stresses are a linear function of rate of deformation, could one obtain a true description of the motion of a fluid by any other method, if any?

2. Even when we don't make any assumption on pressure drop, Reynolds number and viscosity, why is the solution obtained in Hagen Poiseuille theory of pipe flow valid for only laminar flow?

3. Some authors say that there is conservation of momentum and some use the term momentum theorem to derive the NS equations based on Newton's Second Law of motion. Why is this confusion? Is the momentum really conserved? If not, what is the true fact?

4. When a fluid is at rest, does it develop a thermodynamic pressure or a hydrostatic pressure? If so, how?



  Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2000, 06:16
Default Re: Quesions Simple
Posts: n/a
Hi Ram,

I can go into some of the questions you have raised, but I suggest you read GK Batchelors, Introduction to Fluid dynamics. It has discussions on almost all these questions (maybe not the H-P flow)

For the HP flow, we assume a single length scale and obtain a single Re! Which will probably give you the laminar solution. Turbulence has infinite length scales and is approached through growing disturbances and non-linear interactions between these disturbances. It is surely true that in the absence of any disturbances a parabolic profile is surely a solution to the NS equations even for arbitrarily large Reynolds numbers.

regards, chidu...
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2000, 06:50
Default Re: Quesions Simple
Daniel Jaeggi
Posts: n/a
H-P flow is only valid for laminar flow beacuse of the assumptions you have made about variation in shear stress in the y-direction. The only reason you can perform the integration necessary to obtain a solution is because you substitute d(tau)/dy with tau = miu*dv/dy. This substitution is only valid for laminar flow. In turbulent flow, extra terms are generated based on the variation of velocity rendering the integral unsolvable.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2000, 02:17
Default Thanks
Posts: n/a
Thank you
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2000, 02:11
Default Re: Quesions Simple
Dr. H.K.Narahari
Posts: n/a
When Linearity assumtions wrt to deformations are not valid, then the fluid is called Non-Newtonian and we need to have a different set of equations. Needless to say, they are even more sticky than the familier N-S equations. Modelling flow of Blood in arteries for example falls in this domain. There are researchers our there who work in this area, unfortunately I don't have any references at present. I will pass on any info I get in future
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates zouchu Main CFD Forum 1 January 20, 2014 18:02
How to add correcting pressure equation in SIMPLE of MRFSimpleFOAM? renyun0511 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 November 4, 2010 02:38
compressible SIMPLE method fakor Main CFD Forum 1 August 30, 2010 11:21
paraview simple quesions preibie OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 2 June 29, 2009 05:15
PISO vs. SIMPLE benedikt flurl Main CFD Forum 2 April 14, 2005 06:54

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11.