# conformal transformations

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 8, 2000, 13:23 conformal transformations #1 Alex lyons Guest   Posts: n/a Trying to transform an airfoil into a near circle using the inverse of the joukowski formula x = z + a^2/z where x,z complex , "a" effectively constant and getting stupid results. Any suggestions?

 November 8, 2000, 13:46 Re: conformal transformations #2 andy Guest   Posts: n/a Alex, A few suggestions (and implementations) are on netlib: http://www.netlib.org/conformal/ Andy.

 November 10, 2000, 10:37 Re: conformal transformations #3 Alex lyons Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks Andy, you seem to have a certain knowledge about this, have you ever come across a reverse solution for the specific problem of the inverse of x= 1/2(z+1/z)? The site was helpful regardless. Alex

 November 10, 2000, 13:28 Re: conformal transformations #4 Nishikawa Guest   Posts: n/a I have some experience with the inverse transformation of Karman-Treffz airfoils. I encountered a difficulty in getting a circle for highly cambered airfoil. I found that the mapping is not one-to-one inside a certain lense shape. So, if the airfoil is so cambered that a part of it (typically, lower surface, near trailing edge) will be contained in this lense shape, then the points in there will not be mapped back onto the circle from which the airfoil was generated. So, going from circle to airfoil is fine, but its inverse is not necessarily fine. I don't know how to get around this yet. Do you have a problem for cambered airfoil?

 November 10, 2000, 13:36 Re: conformal transformations #5 andy Guest   Posts: n/a Sorry. I last looked at conformal transformation nearly 20 years ago and most things are pretty vague now - if not completely forgotten!, Andy.

 November 10, 2000, 14:58 Re: conformal transformations #6 Alex lyons Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks Nishikawa, I haven't come across Karman-Treffz airfoils but I assume the transform for them is similar that of Joukowsky's. What method did you use to transform it to the circle? I'll look into the discontinuities to see if I can give you any input, Alex

 November 10, 2000, 21:51 Re: conformal transformations #7 Nishikawa Guest   Posts: n/a Karman-Treffz airfoil is more general than Joukowsky's, it generates airfoils with trailing edge of finite angle. In both cases, a circle is mapped to an airfoil. Inverse transformation will map the airfoil to a circle. So, in the case of Joukowsky, x = z + a^2/z which transforms a circle in z-plane to an airfoil in x-plane, if we have a solution for a circle, we get a solution for an airfoil in x. This transformation can be written also as (x-2a)/(x+2a)=(z-a)^2/(z+a)^2. You can solve this for z easily, and get the inverse transformation: z = a [sqrt(x+2a)+sqrt(x-2a)]/[sqrt(x+2a)-sqrt(x-2a)]. This is what I use to transform an airfoil into a circle. It sounds like what you're saying is something different...

 November 14, 2000, 15:59 Re: conformal transformations #8 alex lyons Guest   Posts: n/a Nishikawa, I think what you have given me is the solution to what I'm looking for but in practice I cannot get it to produce a circle in the z plane. Do you have any suggestions as to books I could find this reverse transfrom in to be used in practicle applications?

 November 14, 2000, 20:54 Re: conformal transformations #9 Nishikawa Guest   Posts: n/a I don't know any books that describe the inverse transformation. I wonder why you can't produce a circle. What is the problem? What do you get? As I mentioned, it has a problem when the sirfoil has large camber, but it works for others. But of course it does not transform an arbitrary airfoil into a perfect circle.

 November 15, 2000, 05:59 Re: conformal transformations #10 alex lyons Guest   Posts: n/a I can produce an airfoil fine but when I reverse transform it it comes out as a smaller shifted version of the original airfoil. To get this I got z in terms of x using a quadratic to solve for z. Is this an incorrect procedure in general? With your solution I am getting similar results. should I be applying it by replacing x and z with complex numbers in the form of e.g. u+iv? Thanks for you help in the matter

 November 16, 2000, 04:57 Re: conformal transformations #11 Nishikawa Guest   Posts: n/a Well, I never had such a problem. The inverse transformation formula I wrote down worked for me. I wrote a code to do the transformation in FORTRAN 77 and 90 which handle complex numbers. I don't have to break z=u+iv into u and v. I use the formula as it is. Good Luck!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post araghunath OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 1 April 7, 2011 04:27 Jade M Main CFD Forum 3 March 18, 2010 13:10 otho Main CFD Forum 2 May 30, 2008 11:11 Ralf Schmidt FLUENT 5 May 16, 2006 17:35 Alvin Szeto Main CFD Forum 19 June 27, 2003 07:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:42.