
[Sponsors] 
December 9, 2000, 06:30 
Law of the Wall in FreeSurface Flows

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Dear Friends. To me, here is a difficult problem.
Let us consider an impinging jet onto a flat plate, in high Reynolds number. In this case, the fluid spread out in a thin layer on the plate. In general, in order to apply the loglaw, we need of the parallel velocity in EMPTY cells just above of the first cell in the innerlayer. Also, in order to conserve the momentum, we need to discretize the transport equation for the velocity in the constantstress layer, but in EMPTY cells we not apply the Reynoldsaveraged NavierStokes equations. So, I have two questions: a) If you use a uniform grid to simulate this freesurface problem, how to use the law of the wall? b) How we determine the ghost value for the velocity? Thank you very much. Valdemir. 

December 9, 2000, 13:47 
Re: Law of the Wall in FreeSurface Flows

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

(1).First of all, you can read the previously posted messages related to the use of the wall function, through the search key in this forum. (2). I can only give you a brief description once again here. (3). In the region where you are trying to solve numerically, you must use a turbulence model which can reproduce the law of the wall logprofile solution. (4). Since the law of the wall logprofile is valid (or has been shown experimentally) for boundary layer flows with small adverse pressure gradient (including favorable pressure gradient) over a large portion of the boundary layer, this commonly valid region can be served as the matching region for the numerical solution and the analytical loglaw profile wall function. This is the key to the use of the wall function. (5). The analytical wall function has one unknown, the skin friction coefficient.(or the wall shear stress) Once the skin friction is known, the velocity can be calculated from the law of the wall with the matching point location measured from the wall. The velocity calculated can then be used in the numerical solution as a boundary condition. From the numerical solution, you can evaluate the shear stress at the boundary, which is taken as a constant throughout the law of the wall region. Therefore, it is the same as the wall shear stress or the skin friction, this numerically updated skin friction can be used to update the velocity at the matching point again, until the process converges. (6). The actual implementation of this matching process varies depending on the school of thought, the problem formulation, etc.. It also routinely involves the turbulence quantity such as TKE (k) at the matching point. (7). The wall function approach has nothing to do with freesurface issue at all.


December 10, 2000, 06:01 
Re: Law of the Wall in FreeSurface Flows

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Dr. John. Thanks for your considerations. I completely agree with you. But, your comments are only valid in the context of confined flows. Valdemir.


December 10, 2000, 06:24 
Re: Law of the Wall in FreeSurface Flows

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

(1). I guess, we are probably talking about two different things. (2). Sorry, anyone wishes to comment on this problem please continue.


December 14, 2000, 14:23 
Re: Law of the Wall in FreeSurface Flows

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Are you using Fluent? If yes I cant help. If no I will try.
Gs 

December 15, 2000, 05:47 
Re: Law of the Wall in FreeSurface Flows

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

No I am not. I am using the SMAC method.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Free surface flows and multiphase flows  Vidar  Main CFD Forum  0  September 18, 2008 05:05 
High Reynolds Free Surface Flows  Ferreira  Main CFD Forum  3  September 28, 2005 02:45 
the law of the wall for rough surface  maximus  Main CFD Forum  0  January 31, 2004 09:45 
Free surface flows  Wilhelm Brandstaetter  Main CFD Forum  2  July 20, 2000 17:21 
Modeling Free Surface Flows  Elliot Schwartz  Main CFD Forum  5  August 25, 1998 21:03 