|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am interested in CFD to model flow in fractured rocks. Traditionally, Darcy's law has been used to model flow in porous media: however, it is said that there are limitations on Darcy's law to be applied to flow in rock fractures. It would be very appreciated, if anyone who has practical experiences in this issue could tell me what these limitations are.
Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The flow in the fructure may not be laminar any more. It is most probibly turbulence, thefore the Darcy's may fail.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Al-Shaaln,
Could you give me refereces on this issue? S. Yokuda |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Wiki - We Need More Help! | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 26, 2005 08:11 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 11:44 |