# Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 29, 2001, 14:27 Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow #1 V. G. Ferreira Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Dear Friends, In recent days I am trying to simulate the vortex sheeding behind square cilinder, in case of turbulent regime. My questions are: a) What is the domain in order to capturate the wake; b) What are the correct boundary contions in this case. Thanks. Valdemir.

 January 29, 2001, 14:40 Re: Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). If you put a square cylinder in a very confined space, then it will restrict the wake oscillations. (2). As a matter of fact, people have being using a splitter plate attached to the back end of the body to reduce the wake oscillation. (3). So, my suggestion is: increase the computational domain as large as possible. This can be accomplished by using non-uniform mesh. (4). With a large computational domain, the effect of boundary condition will be minimized. That is, you can use simple boundary conditions in any way you like. If you reduce the computational domain, you will have a lot of problems with the boundary conditions. Don't try that, unless it is absolutely necessary.

 January 29, 2001, 16:46 Re: Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow #3 Astrid Guest   Posts: n/a What is a square cylinder? Is it rectangular or is it round or is it a rounded rectangular? Astrid

 January 29, 2001, 17:53 Re: Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow #4 jongdae kim Guest   Posts: n/a Streamwise direction : Total : 21.0 D Upstream : 5.0 D Downstream : 16.0 D Acrosss Stream direction Total : 16.0 D Spanwise direction : periodic b.c. Total : 2.0 D Here, D is a dimension of square cylinder section.

 January 31, 2001, 23:46 Re: Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow #5 C. Lei Guest   Posts: n/a I am wondering how or where you get this dimensions. I have a feeling that none of these is sufficient to minimize boundary effects. This is based on my experience with circular cylinders.

 February 1, 2001, 19:30 Re: Vortex Sheding in Turbulent Flow #6 jongdae kim Guest   Posts: n/a Yes, You are right. The bigger computational domain, the better results you can get. But with this computational domain, I got reasonable results. The discrepancy between experimental results and LES output of mine is not only the problem of the size of computational domain, but also turbulence model, control volume size, ... etc. Please refer other papers (maybe the domain size is similar to my suggestion).

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post bernarde Main CFD Forum 1 March 26, 2009 11:50 max91 CFX 1 July 29, 2008 20:28 lenson Siemens 3 December 27, 2005 02:27 Z. Zeng Main CFD Forum 3 May 10, 2000 05:18 Tylor Xie Main CFD Forum 0 June 9, 1999 07:33

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33.