# Vortex-Shedding Flow at High-Reynolds Number

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 16, 2001, 12:47 Vortex-Shedding Flow at High-Reynolds Number #1 Ferreira, V.G. Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Dear friends, In recent days, I have been simulated the behaviour of the flow behind a square cylinder. My code uses RANS and two K-Epsilon models (the standard and Low-Reynolds). With both the models, the two-vortex row does not persist in the wake. My question is: is this behaviour correct? Thanks. Ferreira.

 February 16, 2001, 14:44 Re: Vortex-Shedding Flow at High-Reynolds Number #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). Fill your bath tub with water. (2). Move the square cylinder stick through the surface of the water in a steady stroke. (3). Observe the wake behind the square cylinder. (4). Spread some baby powder on the surface to aid the observation. Estimate the Reynolds number and check the result. (5). Effect of Reynolds number? You will have to run a real test to find out.

 February 23, 2001, 13:36 Re: Vortex-Shedding Flow at High-Reynolds Number #3 Nick Georgiadis Guest   Posts: n/a Your RANS simulation is doing what it is designed to do with the k-eps. (an eddy viscosity) model - all unsteady turbulent motion, and the unsteady vortex shedding, is smeared out with the large eddy viscosities thrown into the simulation just behind your square through the use of the k-eps. model. As a result, the unsteadiness that occurs in real life can't be reproduced At best, what you can expect from your RANS simulation using the turbulence model is something that is close to the long time average of the real flow.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 10:37 Terje CFX 3 June 20, 2007 08:10 Neil Main CFD Forum 3 October 24, 2006 08:11 toni CFX 1 July 31, 2001 00:54 wowakai Main CFD Forum 10 December 29, 1998 14:46

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top