Grashof Number

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 30, 2001, 02:33 Grashof Number #1 Adrian Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links For a 2-D flow in a horizontal rectangular enclosure, does the characteristic length /temperature differemce as defined in Grashof Number refer to the length or the height? I am confusing myself, please englighten.

 April 30, 2001, 11:11 Re: Grashof Number #2 Roger Lucheta Guest   Posts: n/a The characteristic dimension is the dimension PARALLEL to the body force vector - in this case, the "height". (Centrifugal forces get more interesting)

 April 30, 2001, 11:53 Re: Grashof Number #3 Adrian Guest   Posts: n/a Oh i see....so that would mean that with the differentially heated vertical walls (insulated horizontal walls), the characteristic length would refer to the height of the rectangle. The temperature difference, i assume, would still be the difference in temperature between the two walls? Thank you.

 April 30, 2001, 15:22 Re: Grashof Number #4 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). It is up to you to pick the characteristic length for your analysis. It can be the height, the length or the sum of the two, etc... (2). Since the geometry is fixed, the conversion between different length scales is also fixed. (3). The Reynolds number can be defined using either the height or the width. It is up to you. Re,h=Re,w * (h/w) ; G,h=G,w * (h/w)^3.

 April 30, 2001, 23:08 Re: Grashof Number #5 Adrian Guest   Posts: n/a I think i understand what you mean. However, i have encountered journals, which involves the rectangular geometry that i have mentioned in my earlier post, most of which uses the height as the chracteristic length while the temperature difference is the temp between the two differentially heated vertical walls. Are there any reasons for this?

 May 1, 2001, 00:21 Grashof Number- maybe not #6 George Bergantz Guest   Posts: n/a As John points out the length scale is often picked in a way that is not obviously motivated. In fact the Grashof number may not even be the correct dimensionless group unless your Prandtl number is much less than 1, that is in molten metals say. For Prandtl numbers of 1 or greater, the Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers are the appropriate groups, and for a Prandtl number of greater than say 10 to 100, even it doesn't matter much as the thermal boundary layer lies well within the velocity boundary layer. This is discussed with some "emphasis" in the book "Convection Heat Transfer" by Adrian Bejan. A very nice book that provides a very intuitive presentation to scaling analysis. I strongly recommend it (except the chapter on turbulence has been controversial).

 May 1, 2001, 08:24 Re: Grashof Number- maybe not #7 Adrian Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks. I will go look for that book. In the mean time, i assume it would be safe to assume that the height is the characteristic length?

 May 1, 2001, 17:02 Re: Grashof Number- maybe not #8 Astrid Guest   Posts: n/a I am not sure if the characteristic length is the right one. If the length of your geometry is 1 meter but the width only 0.001, no change you will find buoyancy effects. Therefore, as George pointed out, perhaps you should use the Rayleigh-number Pr*Gr*dh/L with dh the hydrodynamics diameter and L the length. Check an oldie for this: Metais & Eckert, J. Heat Transfer, 86C , 1964, 295. Cheers, Astrid

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Luiz Eduardo Bittencourt Sampaio (Sampaio) OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities 42 January 8, 2017 13:55 maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 09:01 hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36 andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 10:37 michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15