CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

upwind v.s. chequerboard

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 13, 2001, 20:16
Default upwind v.s. chequerboard
  #1
Darcy Jiang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi! eveybody

Does anyone know how the upwind schemes eliminate the chequerboard oscillation on pressure and velocity field? Does it mean that use upwind scheme to determine the velocity on contral volume surface?

Best regard

Darcy
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2001, 05:41
Default Re: upwind v.s. chequerboard
  #2
Sebastien Perron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
An upwind discretization of the advection term as nothing to do with the elimination of checkerboard board pressure solutions.

1) An upwind discretization of the advection term stabilized the solution for advection driven transport of a scalar quantity.

2). The checkerboard type solution for pressure as to do with incorrect space functions for velocity and pressure.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2001, 11:10
Default Re: upwind v.s. chequerboard
  #3
Anthony Wachs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Sebastien is definitively true!!

To avoid checkerboard pressure solutions, the easiest way is to use staggered grid (see Patankar) for pressure and velocity, which is equivalent to use Raviart-Thomas element for velocity and Q0 element for pressure.

Bye
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2001, 07:15
Default Re: upwind v.s. chequerboard
  #4
Barry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Or of course if you opt for the "better" more suitable Co-located grid, you may use the so called "Rhie and Chow" interpolation. Co located grids is the obvious choice as unstructured grids may be handled without too much complications.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2001, 03:05
Default Re: upwind v.s. chequerboard
  #5
Tony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi,dear Sebastien,

I have a problem about the upwind or hybrid scheme,I want to extend my code(central difference for all space derivatives) to fluid field including separation,now,I use Adams-bashforth for the convective terms[i.e.,du/dx(t+1)=3/2(du/dx(t))-1/2(du/dx(t-1))],I wonder,if I can use upwind or hybrid scheme for du/dx(t) and du/dx(t-1) to evaluate du/dx(t+1)?here,t is the time step.

thanks
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! Far Main CFD Forum 7 March 14, 2013 12:29
Why results differs between upwind and vanLeerV kjetil OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 10, 2012 04:55
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! Far CFX 9 May 31, 2011 08:21
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) Far FLUENT 0 May 22, 2011 01:50
Wrong fvm::div assembling santiagomarquezd OpenFOAM Bugs 90 December 27, 2010 12:54


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:40.