CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Novel wall function method --? (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/3699-novel-wall-function-method.html)

LS Frinch July 13, 2001 03:49

Novel wall function method --?
 
I came across a web article somewhere about a wall function method that actually involved moving the solid surface slightly so as to achieve the required y+ constraint. The thoery being that the results are far less sensitive to moving a wall very slightly compared to trying to get the required grid distribution.

I simply can't find the article any longer. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thank you.

sylvain July 13, 2001 09:56

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
It seems interesting but what should you do then for a stagnation point where u+ tends to zero ?

Sylvain

LS Frinch July 13, 2001 11:09

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
Good point. Don't know. As with all these things, it is a shame to not proceed with an idea just becasue of a 'but' or 'what if'. I'm sure it was a commercial CFD vendor who published this info. Can't for the life of me remember who.

sylvain July 13, 2001 11:17

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
It looks like a CHAM (Phenix) or CD (Star CD) idea. I did look at such a think, but I gave up - question of time and of stagnation point ;-).

John C. Chien July 14, 2001 03:33

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
(1). Still talking about a variation of the black art? (2). In my opinion, most implementations of the wall function were incorrect. (or severely constrainted)

LS Frinch July 14, 2001 05:15

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
...which is why there's so much scope for novel methods, new approaches etc. Just because it ain't there yet is no reason not to push on.

John C. Chien July 14, 2001 13:00

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
(1). I have discussed the right approach here many times already. And I have used it since early 70's. (2). Since the turbulent flow is very common in real world application, incorrect implementation had already made the published results un-reliable, for the last 30 years I guess. (3). Once you become familiar with the low Reynolds number model implementation and its actual usage in an application, it is not difficult to understand the problem with the wall function implementations for the attached flows.

Martin Bowers July 19, 2001 10:18

Re: Novel wall function method --?
 
Try the CFX site. They've implemented it into TASCflow.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:41.