|
[Sponsors] |
August 24, 2001, 05:15 |
[difference ; SIP, CGS ?]
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi all. Strongly Implicit Procedure, Conjugate Gradient. Which one is better ? (I need faster solver...) thx.
|
|
August 25, 2001, 12:54 |
Re: [difference ; SIP, CGS ?]
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Depends on the problem at hand. I would suggest learning about each solver (there is a e-book online here somewhere Templates of Liner solvers or somthing like that).
I see alot of Stone solvers in SIMPLE Codes... More and More I am seeing the use of Conjugate Gradient as a preconditioner then the stone algorithm is applied... there is a good tutorial of congugate gradients on-line somewhere... (An introduction to the conjugate gradient method without the agonizing pain by Jonathan Shewchuk) |
|
August 25, 2001, 22:06 |
Re: [difference ; SIP, CGS ?]
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Neither of what u said is as good as MSIP, Modified Stone's Solver by Schnider & Zedan. Phoenics uses MSIP for Pres. Correction equation. CGS/PCGS can be used for P' equation bcos the coeff matrix is symmetric. for Momentum/energy equn's the upwinding & other host of schemes will destroy symmetry of coeff matrix. CGS is not applicable directly then. Hope this helps Abhijit |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kiva 3v , cgs library. | chat1983 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 3, 2009 06:26 |
Periodic BC's and Stone SIP Solver | ilyasy | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 14, 2009 07:04 |
periodic BC with SIP solver | Joe | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 28, 2002 11:45 |
SIP solver | Peter | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 29, 2001 14:52 |
Parallel version of SIP ? | Ravikanth Avancha | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 19, 1999 15:21 |