CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulence Intensity Vs CFD Simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 14, 1998, 03:24
Default Turbulence Intensity Vs CFD Simulation
Apple L S Chan
Posts: n/a
Turbulence intensity of a point inside space can be obtained by using measured velocities of that point varied with time. However, in CFD simulation, only steady state results of velocity, temperature, pressure, turbulence kinetic energy and dissipation rate of turbulence kinetic energy are calculated. Could anyone please tell me if there is any direct relationship/equation linking turbulence intensity and CFD simulated results, i.e. can I use the CFD simulated results to calculate or estimate the turbulence intensity at any point of the indoor space.

Thank you!
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 1998, 03:40
Default Re: Turbulence Intensity Vs CFD Simulation
Gary Dantinne
Posts: n/a

At first, for me turbulence intensity and turbulence kinetic energy are the same so it would be fine if you define what you mean by turbulence intensity.

Second, I am not sure that measuring turbulence intensity at a specified location at a specified time will give useful information. You need mean values in order to compare efficiently different approaches to study turbulence. Therefore it seems to me that only "mean (in time or in space or ...) turbulence intensity" (rms of the velocity fluctuations) deserves to be measured and compared to theory or numerical computations. And this quantity (the rms of the velocity fluctuations) can in principle be found using classical CFD tools.

Hope it helps,

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 1998, 03:48
Default Re: Turbulence Intensity Vs CFD Simulation
Fabien Coppens
Posts: n/a
If I may, I'd like to add this : with CFD you do not only get steady states !! You can run temporal simulations (time-marching) of unsteady phenomena, with either RANS or DNS/LES approaches. It is then possible to carry out local spatial averaging of flow variables at each time step, thus obtaining an "average" and a "fluctuating" velocity field, which allow you to define a form of turbulent kinetic energy. It is also theoretically possible to carry out spatial simulations (marching in space instead of in time) and you can then carry out your time-averaging process just like in the "classical" definition of stochastic averaging in the "turbulent" Navier-Stokes equations. Hope I was clear enough !

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 1998, 17:28
Default Re: Turbulence Intensity Vs CFD Simulation
Erwin Platvoet
Posts: n/a
For fully developed pipe flows the turbulent intensity at the core can be estimated by I = 0.16 (Re)^-1/8
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD Salary CFD Main CFD Forum 17 January 3, 2017 17:09
High turbulence intensity wenfengxie FLUENT 1 April 16, 2010 12:00
turbulence intensity for skyscraper antonella grassano FLUENT 0 October 13, 2004 06:50
Reactor simulation using CFD takes to the Internet Mark Brennan Main CFD Forum 0 April 16, 1999 05:57
CFD - Trends and Perspectives Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 16 August 7, 1998 16:27

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:41.