CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

channel half width/ boundary layer thickness

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 25, 2001, 06:12
Default channel half width/ boundary layer thickness
Peter liang
Posts: n/a
when I read the papers of DNS and LES, such as, 1. "Zonal Embedded Grids for Numerical Simulations of Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows". A.G. Kravchenko. 2. Kim John, " Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number". 3. Parviz Moin " Numerical investigation of turbulent channel flow ".

I think the channel half width (delta) and boundary layer thickness used there should be a constant. But I really cannot figure out what value it is.

Please help me if you have any points about it.

Many thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 26, 2001, 15:55
Default Re: channel half width/ boundary layer thickness
John C. Chien
Posts: n/a
(1). In a fully-developed channel flow, you don't have a boundary layer at all. (2). The half width or the channel size is no longer a parameter. Instead, you are talking about the Reynolds number. (3). I am no expert in DNS or LES, but in either case, the difference is in the governing equations. DNS is transient Navier-Stokes equations, LES is transient Navier-Stokes equations + sub-scale modeling. And RANS is Reynolds average of transient Navier-Stokes equations + global Reynolds stress modeling. (4). I think, LES is a troublesome concept.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 26, 2001, 16:42
Default Re: channel half width/ boundary layer thickness
Posts: n/a
Most LES of channel flows are temporal simulations, i.e., they use periodic boundary conditions for velocities in both axial and spanwise directions. The pressure BC is step periodic and the pressure difference drives the flow.

After you attain a statistically stationary state, you have fully developed turbulent flow and there is no boundary layer thickness (the top and the bottom boundary layers merge to produce the fully developed flow profile). The only parameter in the simulation is Re. You can set any value for the half-width as long as the Re based on half-width, centerline mean velocity and kinematic viscosity gives you the Re you need. Also, the axial length of the domain should atleast be 4 to 5 times the channel width. Also not that sometimes the Re quoted is the friction Reynolds number based on friction velocity rather than bulk velocity.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 27, 2001, 04:10
Default Re: channel half width/ boundary layer thickness
Peter liang
Posts: n/a
I set x direction Lx=12; boundary layer thickness delta=2; To follow exactly the Reynolds number, I think, it should be okay for me gain simularity.

Thanks for you two valuable suggestions.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] Boundary layer in a pipe Clementhuon OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 March 12, 2012 12:41
Boundary layer thickness ghazanfarzahedi Main CFD Forum 2 July 28, 2009 23:43
Boundary layer thickness in pipe entrance Bo Jensen Main CFD Forum 2 April 6, 2007 22:53
errors Fahad Main CFD Forum 0 March 23, 2004 13:20
Boundary Layer Flow Paradox Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 September 24, 2002 08:47

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21.