|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi! I'm doing this code on an external body flow. Basically I need to use the standard 2D Cartesian coordinates (x,y) to compute the flowfield around a moving circular cylinder WITHOUT moving the cartesian grid. The frame is fixed and the cylinder is moving in a fixed prescribed velocity and I'm using the streamfunction-vorticity formulation of the Navier Stokes equation to compute.
Usually if the cylinder is fixed (not moving), we can derive the streamfunction at the cylinder by using the summation of (del operator x vorticity) along the cylinder surface. But for moving cylinder, that is not the case. Does anyone know what equation should I use to derive the cylinder streamfunction for the moving case? Thank you! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
fix your frame of reference on the cylinder
Adrin Gharakhani |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What about immersed boundary method?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm trying not to fix my frame to the cylinder, in case for my future developments, I will need to oscillate two or more cylinders within the same field.
So basically I'd have a "sub" frame moving with the cylinder but with reference to a stationary cartesian frame. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow over a Cylinder. 2D vs 3D cylinder (moving) | ojha.mayank485 | CFX | 0 | June 20, 2011 15:25 |
Moving a Cylinder in cross flow after solving Dynamics equations of motion | maruthamuthu_venkatraman | OpenFOAM | 1 | November 19, 2009 13:55 |
moving cylinder in a cartesian grid | yusun | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 1, 2009 03:48 |
Confined or moving cylinder | Mohamed GUEROUACHE | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 23, 1999 15:20 |
Confined or moving cylinder | Mohamed GUEROUACHE | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 19, 1999 11:00 |