FEM vs FDM

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 10, 2002, 14:25 FEM vs FDM #1 Jack Guest   Posts: n/a Can we use FEMs for flow analysis?

 January 10, 2002, 16:38 Re: FEM vs FDM #2 andy Guest   Posts: n/a Yes.

 January 10, 2002, 18:23 Re: FEM vs FDM #3 P.Fonteijn Guest   Posts: n/a Discontinuites, like shocks, are hard to describe. And, don't expect any speed up compared to FDM. FEM is as slow as FDM. Pascale

 January 10, 2002, 22:18 Re: FEM vs FDM #4 cfd user Guest   Posts: n/a There are many existing commercial codes which use FEM as their discretization. It will tend to be slower as mentioned in another response but literature shows it to be more accurate, requiring less grid points then FDM or FEM. Links between a FEA solver and CFD solver can be made with the finite element technique. It will probably be the way some day.

 January 11, 2002, 01:40 Re: FEM vs FDM #5 Ist Guest   Posts: n/a Dear all, How about with FVM ? I think it is more stable solution compared with FDM. But, what's your comment ?

 January 16, 2002, 17:31 Re: FEM vs FDM #6 kenn Guest   Posts: n/a if it's an old FEM software, I guess it can't solve convetion dominating flow problems very well, because of stability issue. but in fluid mechanics, todays' finite element kind methods are much better than FDM

 January 16, 2002, 17:48 Re: FEM vs FDM #7 kenn Guest   Posts: n/a all FEM, FDM, FVM, and spectral element methods are special forms of weighted residue methods. none of them are better method for every problems. by logic, FV must have disadvantages. it's stable due to it's local control of conservation, which is obviously better than global control; it treats complex gemotry much better than FD, which has to use boundary fitted coordinates or transformation to another space(computational space). so, FV is a general-purposed method. so why still FD? I guess, for many problems, FV lacks accuracy. FD could converge much faster than both FV and FE for many problems. Spectral element converges even faster, however, in each step it costs more time to do integration( I guess) something like that. also, FD is the easiest method to implement. BEM(boundary element) is the fastest method. so, I'll say, if a problem can be solved using FD or BE gracefully, then use them; otherwise, consider the other three methods.

 January 17, 2002, 09:11 Re: FEM vs FDM #8 Herve Guest   Posts: n/a Look at the book edited by 33. Wendt, J.F., (1996), "Computational Fluid Dynamics  An Introduction", Springer. or the paper by Idelsohn, S.R., Oņate, E., (1994), "Finite Volumes and Finite Elements: Two 'Good Friends'", Int. J. num. Meth. Eng., Vol. 37, pp. 3323-3341. for a comparison. the advantage of FVM is that it is easy and fast to compute, and mass conservative (something more difficult to achieve with FEM I believe).

 January 18, 2002, 19:13 Re: FEM vs FDM #9 Scott Guest   Posts: n/a

 January 21, 2002, 03:04 Re: FEM vs FDM #10 Ist Guest   Posts: n/a I think those method (FEM, FDM and FVM) has disadvantage and advantage. No method has not disadvantages. Ok

 January 27, 2002, 11:42 Re: FEM vs FDM #11 yangqing Guest   Posts: n/a now is FVM , one fdm method

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tH3f0rC3 OpenFOAM 4 September 3, 2015 02:51 ck5285 FLOW-3D 1 September 1, 2009 10:51 Alf Main CFD Forum 5 October 28, 2005 14:03 RAJ FLUENT 2 October 7, 2005 08:25 kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:53.