Can a 2D CFD code predict turbulent?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 23, 2002, 11:41 Can a 2D CFD code predict turbulent? #1 babyface Guest   Posts: n/a I am doubt about that. I am asked to simulate turbulence pipe flow passing a sudden expansion (Re=4E05) using 2D commercial code . As far as I know , turbulence at least is a 3D flow . By the way , if I use 2D geometry and set axissymmetrical , will it model the 3D flow in pipe? Thanks

 May 23, 2002, 14:47 Re: Can a 2D CFD code predict turbulent? #2 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a You can simulate a turbulent flow in 2D if you use a turbulence model. Turbulence itself is a 3D phenomenon, but you can model its effect on a 2D flow by using a turbulence model. A 2D axisymmetric model will of course not predict non-axisymmetric features, it will predict a 3D axisymmetric flow though.

 May 24, 2002, 10:06 Re: Can a 2D CFD code predict turbulent? #3 sylvain Guest   Posts: n/a If you use a RANS model, since the average value of the third velocity component is equal to zero, you can use a 2D simulation. The turbulence model takes into account fluctuations in the third direction which of course are non zero. If you are doing LES or DNS, then you MUST used a 3D mesh to let "live" fluctuations in the three spatial directions. Hope that helps, Sylvain

 May 30, 2002, 10:49 Re: Can a 2D CFD code predict turbulent? #4 Patrick Godon Guest   Posts: n/a That's OK, go ahead and do your simulations, you can simulate turbulence in 2D. However keep in mind that 2D turbulence and 3D turbulence are different. In 2D the inverse cascade of energy will lead to the formation of large vortices (the energy flows to the large scale) while in 3D the flow structure will be more complex. As Jonas mentioned you will be restricted to axisymmetrical modes and the conditions for the instability of the flow (transition from laminar to turbulence) in the 3D flow will be different than in the 2D simulations. Do not expect transition to occur for the same Reynold number in 2D and 3D. My guess is that in 3D the flow will be unstable sooner than in 2D, because in 3D you have additional modes (non-axisymmetric ones) that maybe can grow faster than the axisymmetric ones. Patrick

 June 26, 2002, 16:23 Re: Can a 2D CFD code predict turbulent? #5 jenny Guest   Posts: n/a It depends on the level of information you expect from the simulation. Of coruse if you expect instantaneous velocity/pressure information, you can't use 2D code. Instead you need 3D, unsteady code. Luckily, in practical application, we only need average values/quantities e.g. mean velocity, wall/Reynolds shear stress, so we can simulate turbulence in 2D code (Navier-Stokes with turbulence model) to obtain average values/quantities. I want to emphasis here again that the problem is still 3D, unsteady phenomena but because you are interesting in average values/quantities; 2D code is OK. I think in your case, you can think of your problem as an axis symmetry (in statistical/average sense not instantaneous one) and perform 2D simulation to get average values/quantities.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 September 25, 2001 10:17 Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2001 06:41 David Carroll Main CFD Forum 8 August 24, 2000 17:25 Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27 Hanson G. He Main CFD Forum 1 October 15, 1998 08:49

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23.