How to choose the CFL number with implicit scheme?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 17, 2002, 12:38 How to choose the CFL number with implicit scheme? #1 D.T. Guest   Posts: n/a We know the CFL numerber must be less 1 when solve the Euler or NS equations with explicit scheme. Although the imiplicit scheme is unconditional stable, the the CFL can not allow infinite in computation.So when we solve thesse eqations with imiplicit scheme, How much CFL numerber is fit for problem?

 October 18, 2002, 02:07 Re: How to choose the CFL number with implicit sch #2 newcomer Guest   Posts: n/a "Although the imiplicit scheme is unconditional stable" - instability may also arise from boundary conditions.

 October 23, 2002, 13:56 Re: How to choose the CFL number with implicit sch #3 Anders Guest   Posts: n/a You are right, the scheme is unconditionally stable. But this does not mean that it is unconditionally accurate! Just like you need a fine grid to resolve your length scales in certain areas of the domain, you need also a fine time step to resolve your physical processes in time in relevant areas. In many cases, the accuracy will not be much affected by taking a larger time step, but in some cases, it may make a large difference. So I would say there is no general answer apart from: stick to a CFL number close to unity, and your chances look fair. In many cases, typically 5 would also be OK. But of course, the information in the info-file is not alone enough to judge this (max CFL and average CFL). You may well allow a CFL number of, say, 20 in some areas of your domain, if they are away (and downstream?) from your main interest area. You need to know your local CFL numbers, which can be extracted from an analyses by the .err file.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 24 June 27, 2016 08:54 mrshb4 OpenFOAM 0 December 13, 2010 12:13 hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 07:36 xiaofish FLUENT 1 October 12, 2007 04:51 Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 5 August 6, 1999 02:01

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:10.