|
[Sponsors] |
December 4, 2002, 02:01 |
SIMPLE
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am using SIMPLE algorithm on unstructured mesh and I am using collocated variables.
On the ourflow boundary, I tried a non-reflecting boundary condition. I set du/dn=0 and dv/dn=0 and dp'/dn=const. The out normal direction is the same as u component velocity. p' is the pressure correction. It never worked for me. I change the boundary condition of p' to p'=0, but it doesn't work either. I have to set the normal velocity and no its gradient. I don't know for imcompressible flow, whether I can set a zero gradient boundary condition for velocity. |
|
December 5, 2002, 04:57 |
Re: SIMPLE
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes. The zero gradient BC for u, v is OK. dp'/dn=0 does not work. In all the BCs, set p'=0.
Jack |
|
January 3, 2003, 15:44 |
Re: SIMPLE
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think what u want to do is set p'=0 on one edge, such as outlet, that is enough. ur problemm is ur code i think, i have writen a code and use SIMPLE successfuly to simulation packed column multiple flow . do check ur code to see if u miss something (Pataker's book)
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates | zouchu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2014 17:02 |
The correction on pressure equation of SIMPLE algorithm in MRFSimpleFOAM solver | renyun0511 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 10, 2010 01:47 |
Making SIMPLE converge faster | Fabio | Main CFD Forum | 4 | April 9, 2006 11:35 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 06:54 |
flow over a 2D cyl using SIMPLE | T | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 27, 2001 07:32 |