Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 22, 2002, 23:47 about Adaptive Grid #1 Baolin Tian Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Dear all, Now i want to use adaptive grid in my computation to solve the N-S eqs. In adaptive grid method, the grid changes in very time step. here,i have one problem,ie., after one time step, I use the new grid, between the old and the new grid, the flow field is distributed in different physical postition. the question is: do I need interplotion between the two grids? Thanks a lot! Happy Xmas and New Year!

 December 23, 2002, 11:10 Re: about Adaptive Grid #2 Pete Guest   Posts: n/a If you are using an r-refinement method, that is, you're moving the existing grid points without introducing new points, you have to either (a) interpolate the solution or (b) account for the flux generated by the moving control volume faces. If you are using an h-refinement method and inserting new points and cells, you will need to interpolated the solution onto the new points. Your grid is changing every time step? I assume this is a transient application?

 December 23, 2002, 22:08 Re: about Adaptive Grid #3 Baolin Tian Guest   Posts: n/a Hi,Pete, Thanks a lot for your help. By your illustration, I know more about the adaptive grid. In my method. I try to solve the compressible and transient N-S eqations by compact difference scheme. I am using an r-refinement method,ie., I don't introduce new point in my method. In every time step,the grid points change in the physical computing plane. In the N-S eqations after coodinate transformation, I used the chain rule of differential calculus to expand the former terms,including the term for the time derivative. So I am not sure whether I need not interpolation or not? And could you explain your (a) and (b) solution for the question? With Best Regards Merry Xmas and Happy New Year Baolin Tian

 December 24, 2002, 09:30 Re: about Adaptive Grid #4 Pete Guest   Posts: n/a You're correct in updating all the transformation metrics and Jacobians. If you account for the flux generated by the moving grid faces then that should be it, you should not need to interpolate. As your grid moves from time step N to N+1, each face will sweep out a volume UG*A*dt, where A is the area of the face and UG is the grid velocity. You must subtract the mass/momentum/energy flux crossing the face. For example, the mass flux becomes rho*(U-UG)*A, where again UG is the grid velocity and U is the fluid velocity. Similarly for the momentum and energy flux, there is a U-UG term. If the grid does not move, the equations reduce to the usual form. Conversely, if the grid moves at the fluid velocity, there is no flux through the face. In a steady-state simulation this would all wash out, but since you're running it transient then this has to be done. Hope it helps.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Harry Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 2006 05:25 PRAPANJ Main CFD Forum 0 March 2, 2006 02:54 Wouter Harteveld FLUENT 0 November 10, 2005 12:21 Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59 Hans Klaufus CFX 1 June 28, 2000 16:43