CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

about Adaptive Grid

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 22, 2002, 22:47
Default about Adaptive Grid
  #1
Baolin Tian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear all,

Now i want to use adaptive grid in my computation to solve the N-S eqs. In adaptive grid method, the grid changes in very time step. here,i have one problem,ie., after one time step, I use the new grid, between the old and the new grid, the flow field is distributed in different physical postition. the question is: do I need interplotion between the two grids?

Thanks a lot!

Happy Xmas and New Year!

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2002, 10:10
Default Re: about Adaptive Grid
  #2
Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are using an r-refinement method, that is, you're moving the existing grid points without introducing new points, you have to either (a) interpolate the solution or (b) account for the flux generated by the moving control volume faces.

If you are using an h-refinement method and inserting new points and cells, you will need to interpolated the solution onto the new points.

Your grid is changing every time step? I assume this is a transient application?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 23, 2002, 21:08
Default Re: about Adaptive Grid
  #3
Baolin Tian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,Pete,

Thanks a lot for your help. By your illustration, I know more about the adaptive grid.

In my method. I try to solve the compressible and transient N-S eqations by compact difference scheme. I am using an r-refinement method,ie., I don't introduce new point in my method. In every time step,the grid points change in the physical computing plane. In the N-S eqations after coodinate transformation, I used the chain rule of differential calculus to expand the former terms,including the term for the time derivative. So I am not sure whether I need not interpolation or not? And could you explain your (a) and (b) solution for the question?

With Best Regards Merry Xmas and Happy New Year

Baolin Tian
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 24, 2002, 08:30
Default Re: about Adaptive Grid
  #4
Pete
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You're correct in updating all the transformation metrics and Jacobians. If you account for the flux generated by the moving grid faces then that should be it, you should not need to interpolate.

As your grid moves from time step N to N+1, each face will sweep out a volume UG*A*dt, where A is the area of the face and UG is the grid velocity. You must subtract the mass/momentum/energy flux crossing the face. For example, the mass flux becomes rho*(U-UG)*A, where again UG is the grid velocity and U is the fluid velocity. Similarly for the momentum and energy flux, there is a U-UG term. If the grid does not move, the equations reduce to the usual form. Conversely, if the grid moves at the fluid velocity, there is no flux through the face.

In a steady-state simulation this would all wash out, but since you're running it transient then this has to be done.

Hope it helps.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
queries Cartesian grid with adaptive technique Harry Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 2006 05:25
weighting function in adaptive grid PRAPANJ Main CFD Forum 0 March 2, 2006 01:54
smooth adaptive grid refinement Wouter Harteveld FLUENT 0 November 10, 2005 11:21
Combustion Convergence problems Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59
Troubles modelling flow through a grid Hans Klaufus CFX 1 June 28, 2000 16:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44.