|
[Sponsors] |
December 28, 2002, 06:24 |
which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which method is the best for cfd applications finite volume,finite difference or spectral methods or finite element. Prasat
|
|
December 28, 2002, 06:44 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi, According to my study so far, i think FV, method is better then all other for FEM, it is better for diffusion dominating problem, not that good for convecion. Although one can use FD, which give trunction error also, but it is not that flexible, and more over a mathematical nature. FV is better, most of the commercialy available software also use this method, also generaly we use same method for derivation of our flow equation..more close to fluid flow and heat transfer. So. I will suggest for FV. Look for other people what they say. bye
|
|
December 28, 2002, 22:59 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
December 29, 2002, 07:47 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends.
Each method has its own advantage. If high accuracy in simple geometry is required, Sp and FD may be the best choice. On the other hand, for complex geometry FV and FE are more convenient. |
|
December 29, 2002, 12:42 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I will say definitely most popular is FVM.
|
|
January 3, 2003, 08:49 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Friends, According to my view FV is the best method because of its basic principle of Conservation of flow properties.it is most accurate in terms of defining the physics of flow. Where as FEM fails in case of supersonic flows where there is discontinuity of the derivative(sudden change of flow properties). Also ,FD becomes very difficult when the geometry is complex due to lots of transformation involved from orthogonal to cartesian and again to orthogonal.Although programming for FD is the simplest.
|
|
January 3, 2003, 14:00 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please read the book by T.J. Chung on CFD....He has elaborated the details, differences and similarities of all these methods in an understandable fashion. He also presented a lot of applications with results.
MT |
|
January 10, 2003, 02:05 |
Re: which is best?FV,FM,FD,Sp methods
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi sachu!!! nice to see you here its realy a cool place enjoy!!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About multigrid methods | Lionel S. | Main CFD Forum | 10 | April 20, 2007 09:22 |
Implicit, high-order methods for Incompressible NS | Dave Rudolf | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 29, 2007 10:13 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 18:28 |
Vortex Methods. | luiz | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 27, 2003 10:47 |
Intl Conf Computational Methods in Fluid Power | Jacek Stecki | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 10, 2002 05:49 |