CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

k-w turbulence model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 6, 2003, 13:59
Default k-w turbulence model
Posts: n/a
Recently I have been investigating the Wilcox k-w turbulence model, and I have a question that hopefully someone(s) can help me with.

Wilcox cites the A.A. Townsend approximation for k as k~t^(-n). I am unclear about what time span the "t" is referring to. Looks like the units don't match, though I'm not sure if they have to in this case.

An explanation of the equation and the "t" would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2003, 15:21
Default k-w turbulence model: update
Posts: n/a
After reviewing the equation, my colleagues and I can only conclude that the "t" is actually a "Tau" or a stress tensor without subscripts, and not a time scale or time span. So at a minimum, its a confusing simplification, and possibly a typo. Any comments?
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2003, 06:33
Default Re: k-w turbulence model: update
Alec Browne
Posts: n/a
I'm assuming you're referring to Wilcox's turbulence and CFD book published by DCW industries.

They have a web page devoted to known typos, and reporting newly-discovered ones:

I suggest you check it out! Good luck
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2003, 21:59
Default Re: k-w turbulence model: final word
Posts: n/a
After sharing e-mails with the author, I've learned that the equation is correct as written k~t^(-n) and t is indeed time. The time scale for this t is infinity and leads to the asymptotic solution for k.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2003, 10:58
Default Re: k-w turbulence model: final word
Posts: n/a
Townsend gives the relation k~t^-n for the (initial) decaying (grid) turbulence and give n the value = 1.25+-0.06. Note that n rises to 2.5 in the final decay. This physical behaviour is one (good) reason for introducing turbulence govern (NOT y+) damping functions. Wilcox and others uses this relation to set the value of the coefficient for the destruction term (C_eps2, beta) in the epsilon/omega-equation.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model FelixL OpenFOAM Bugs 27 March 27, 2012 09:02
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model YJZ ANSYS 1 August 20, 2010 13:57
KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 August 4, 2010 10:26
Fan heater model: what turbulence source to use? andy20 CFX 7 March 3, 2008 17:42
SSG Reynolds Turbulence Model Georges CFX 1 February 28, 2007 17:15

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:31.