When to use Laminar or Turbulent formulation?
Hello,
I want to model Fluid+Heat flow in the air gap between two concentric cylinders. The problem is steady state but I can change the speed of rotation of the inner cylinder. How do I select between Laminar or Turbulent flow?:confused: Do I have to calculate the Taylor or Reynolds Nu before:confused: Will the K-e model predict both:confused: Thanks! |
You may try to see if your Renolds Number falls within the range that the laminar flow may be applicable.
|
Thanks,
I actually thought of that, but I am doing a parametric study. So for low rpm's I could use laminar and for higher turbulent. However, it doesn't seem right to compare the results from two different models. Any ideas? |
hi there
to get a situation of laminar current is pretty tough. theoretically the Re number below 50000 can be laminar current but as a matter of fact we can't get it until 2000. turbulence can be suitable under most of the circumstances unless you want to creat a laminar current situation on purpose. and the standard/RNG/Realizable k-e model is not suitable for the laminar current with a low velocity. regards |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:44. |