
[Sponsors] 
May 7, 2009, 18:25 
Turbulent viscosity ratio

#1 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 9 
Hi,
For a flow through a pipe what are the criteria in choosing the turbulent viscosity ratio, if one were to use the SpallartAllmares turbulent model? Thanks. 

May 7, 2009, 23:38 

#2 
Senior Member
Aroon
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Racine WI
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 9 
Does SA model work well for internal flows? Just curious.


May 11, 2009, 06:58 

#3 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 9 
Not sure mate. I'm new to CFD. So far I can't say whether SA or kepsilon works better. The problem is with kepsilon (for the code I'm using) I need to have be careful of the first grid node of the wall (when using wall functions), with SA, apparently, this is not an issue.


May 11, 2009, 11:57 

#4 
Senior Member
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 9 
It is also possible for you to convert your Ke model into low Re Ke model and you would be able to integrate your model through the viscous layer. Have a look at the book on Wilcox on how SA and Ke model performs for pipe flow.


May 11, 2009, 12:28 

#5 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 9 
I think I tried that. You mean not to use wall functions with kepsilon so that the first grid node has to be at a y+ of 100?


May 11, 2009, 12:33 

#6 
Senior Member
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 9 
There are two versions of the ke model that you can employ. in the first version you place your first grid point in the logarithmic layer (30 < y+<100) and use the so called high Re model. In the second version, you modify the turbulent viscosity with a damping term and integrate through the viscous wall layer. In this method the first grid node has to be below y+ <5.
If you use komega model you can integrate through the viscous layer without damping and sometimes obtain acceptable results. 

May 12, 2009, 06:38 

#7 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 9 
cheers for that useful info.
i've decided to use SA model. I've been told this model will work whether you use wall functions or not. btw, what's the closest you can have your first grid node from the wall? someone on this forum told me that for heat transfer problems the first grid node has to be within a y+ of much smaller than 1. I did a grid independence study and found that when I had the first grid node at y+=1 and changed the vertical grid nodes it kept changing the solution (by solution I mean I measure the temperature, which changes slightly as I change the grid nodes). And when I had it at a very low y+ the change in solution was much small. But I've been told by CFD code developer that it's stupid t have such a small y+. 

May 12, 2009, 12:24 

#8 
Senior Member
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 9 
Using yplus less than 1 ensures grid independent solution. Look for paper by Davidson and Peng  1995  Intl. Jou. of Num. Methods in Fluids. They discuss the grid refinement in the context of komega model but the same applies to your case too.


May 13, 2009, 05:55 

#9 
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 9 
Sorry but I couldn't find that paper you mentioned. It's not even listed on Davidson's webpage. If it's possible could you let me know of the title please?


Tags 
viscosity ratio 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Turbulent viscosity ratio  Balaji  FLUENT  5  May 27, 2014 03:47 
turbulent viscosity ratio  James Willie  FLUENT  1  June 21, 2005 03:35 
On limiting to turbulent viscosity ratio!  varghese  FLUENT  2  November 15, 2003 09:56 
Turbulent Viscosity Ratio  xiang  FLUENT  3  May 20, 2003 12:46 
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited  David Yang  FLUENT  3  June 3, 2002 06:13 