|October 14, 2009, 06:01||
buoyancy flow and mass transport
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4Rep Power: 9
I'm new in this forum and I hope I get some hints helping me to understand my problem. first of all, sorry for my bad english, I'm german.
Using Comsol I simulate brine flow in salt caverns (50... 130m diameter, 50 .. 100m height). It is a laminar up to turbulent flow. At the surrounded wall there is salt dissolution. Salt disssolution causes a higher density of the fluid (rho=f(c,T)), so that mainly buoyancy flow is there. Of course, there is a fresh water input over a well and a brine extraction by a well, too. But the flow (about 10 ... 50 m³/h) is small andit isn't able to control flow regime.
I use FEM (Comsol 3.5a) for solving navier-stokes-eq. and the convection-diffusion-eq. There are many options to solve and tricks to get a solution, but there are some main problems I want to rule.
Buoyancy flow is considered by the Boussinesq-Appr. Fz=-g*delta_rho but it seems, that it isn't very numerical stable. I know there are limitation, delta_rho is about 1300-1000=300kg/m³.
Is there any better way to consider buoyancy flow? This seems to be the main problem.
Other problems are mass transport with a cell-peclet-number >10 ... >100, flow with a cell reynolds-number about 100.
Actual I use a laminar stationary solution, decreasing viscosity and diffusion step by step (restarting) and increasing g of the Boussinesq-Appr. Limit is the number of DOFs to solve for 3D! I use a DELL T7400 with 2 x QuadCore and 32GB RAM.
Is there anybody who works nearly on the same task?
Thank you for any answer!
|buoyancy flow, mass transport|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Target Mass Flow Rate||Nitin||FLUENT||7||April 4, 2017 16:44|
|mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out||saii||CFX||2||September 18, 2009 08:07|
|particle, parcel and mass flow rate balance||flybird||FLUENT||0||May 24, 2007 10:44|
|Mass Flow Inlet||Pravir Kumar Rai||FLUENT||0||February 19, 2003 15:03|
|fluid flow fundas||ram||Main CFD Forum||5||June 17, 2000 21:31|