# Transition: which function to identify it?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 20, 2009, 10:44 Transition: which function to identify it? #1 New Member   Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 25 Rep Power: 10 Hi I'm testing the transition model gammaRetheta in star-ccm+. I would know how I can identify the point at which transition starts. I could use: -a plot of skin friction coefficient -a plot of tubolence intensity -a plot of eddy viscosity -other (tell me ) What do you think it's the best choice? The main problem is that using skin friction coefficient the transition starting point is not very evident; instaed if I use a plot with intensity I get a transition point which is different from the one I get using a plot with eddy viscosity! Thanks!

 October 21, 2009, 08:19 #2 Member   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 55 Rep Power: 10 Gamma is intermittency factor varying from 0 to 1, ie fully laminar to turbulent condition. So, if the option is available, you cans see at what point your gamma starts to increase in the 'boundary layer', denoting start of transition. I would use this rather than turbulent viscosity. Note that in gamma Re_theta model (of Menter) gamma can be greater than 1 for separated flow transition.

 October 22, 2009, 03:35 #3 New Member   Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 25 Rep Power: 10 I want to make it clear first that I'm studying now turbulence models and transition models so I'm not so expert...so I might commit mistakes... I can't visualize gamma but I can visualise directly Intermittency...is the same thing? It's values is 0.02 on the laminar part and after transition It growes up to 0.035...It might be correct? Thanks for all your advices! Sara

 October 22, 2009, 03:49 #4 Member   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 55 Rep Power: 10 Hi Sara, I've worked with transition modeling for my research, and I still wouldn't call myself an expert, so don't worry Yes, gamma is intermittency. Ideally in laminar flow it should be zero, but it is possible for some models to have non-zero values either due to stability requirement or because they include a model for laminar fluctuation. In your fully turbulent region intermittency should be 1 or thereabout according to traditional definition. I suggest you read the paper by Menter, "A correlation-based transition model using local variables-Part I: Model Formulation". Also for general transition understanding the paper by Mayle is excellent, "The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines". Hope this helps.

 October 22, 2009, 03:57 #5 New Member   Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 25 Rep Power: 10 Thanks for all! This paper"A correlation-based transition model using local variables-Part I: Model Formulation" is here on my desptop! And now I'm going to search the other one!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 October 12, 2012 09:31 gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 14:11 skabilan OpenFOAM Installation 3 July 28, 2009 00:35 ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 September 5, 2008 20:50 Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 14:00

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:21.