CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Diffusion / convection

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 17, 1999, 14:11
Default Diffusion / convection
I. Dotsikas
Posts: n/a
Hi, it's clear that the use of Upwind-Diskretisation introduces a quite big error in a calculation. (nummerical diffussion). There are some Methode to diminish this Diffusion, the use of an second Order Approximation is one reasonable Method. An other Method is to use the Power Law or Hybrid Method (see Patankar) or a differed Corection schema or Quick. The most CFD Books stop at this point and don't write furtur abou the diffusion / convection Problem. * Is there a publication comparing all these Methods with each other?

* where can I found some Information about Higher Order modells for Diffusion / convection coupling ?

I am interested on books and artickles introducing and explaining such methods.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 1999, 13:15
Default Re: Diffusion / convection
John C. Chien
Posts: n/a
(1). I am not sure that the use of the up-wind difference will introduce big error in a calculation. (2). Higher order scheme is not equavalent to higher accuracy solution. (3). It simply says that lower order scheme requires more mesh points to capture the truncated higher order terms. (4). The size of the truncated higher order terms depend on the problem to be solved ( solution dependent), the mesh orientation ( coordinate system), the mesh size distribution. These can be optimized in such a way that the size of the truncated higher order term is minimized. (5). The way to do is to study the solution of a particular problem at hand in great detail first. Then with the proper selection of the coordinate system ( mesh orientation ), and the mesh density distribution, one can minimize the truncation error. The body aligned mesh, the adaptive mesh are two methods to achieve this goal. (6). Even if you still insist on using the fixed Cartesian coordinates, simply adding more mesh points will solve the problem. With workstations having 128Meg RAM everywhere, it is hard to get poor results from up-wind methods. But if you still think that solution can only be obtained by using a 41x41 mesh for high Reynolds number problem in Cartesian coordinates, then you will be facing that big error all the time. (7). There is another problem called " consistency ", that is the finite difference equation must approach its original differential form as the mesh size approaches zero. Here we are assuming that the consistency is satisfied. (8). So, Don't Try the Coarse Mesh Solution!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 21, 1999, 16:39
Default Re: Diffusion / convection
anay luketa-hanlin
Posts: n/a
Yes, There have been many improvements on the QUICK method. There is a good journal article on one in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS 98, 108-118 (1992) by T. Hayase, et. al. I am using it right now and so far it has performed very well. I have found it to have very low numerical diffusion. This paper compares CD and UPWIND schemes and other QUICK schemes. Very good paper.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
Convection, diffusion and reaction Joao CFX 0 October 25, 2008 20:19
convection, diffusion, advection, dispersion Lam Main CFD Forum 7 May 18, 2007 12:04
diffusion effect opposite to convection hasan karabay Siemens 0 December 5, 2006 07:59
diffusion convection compressible flow Gijs Main CFD Forum 0 September 27, 2005 09:33

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:55.