# boundary condition for a gassed agitated tank

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 18, 2010, 13:24 boundary condition for a gassed agitated tank #1 New Member   Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 9 Hi, I wonder if anybody has the experience of setting boundary condition for the open top (an interface between gas and liquid) of a gassed and agitated tank. If no volume of air above the interface is included in the computational domain, then some BCs should be set for the tank top. If choosing a pressure outlet Boundary condition for the open tank top , then BC of volume fraction for two phases (say, water and air) should also be set, Fluent and Star-ccm+ alike. I've encountered two problems with this setting. The first one is that if choosing air=1 and water=0, then the whol upper part of the tank will soon be filled with air completely (air VF=1), which is unphysical. There is no way to tell a prior what actual volume fraction of each phase should occupy at the interface (tank top). The second is the total mass of species can not be conserved if species transport model is turned on. If choosing a symmetry BC for the tank top, then you don't need to set volume fraction BC. And the total mass of species is also conserved. But doing actually forces a tangential flow near the interface. Can anyone share their experience how to fix the problem? Thanks, Fiona

 March 22, 2010, 21:02 #2 New Member   Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 22 Rep Power: 9 as far as I understood your case, you made a mistake. It seems that you create a interface between air and water. If so, that's wrong. You should use VOF model and all of the tank will be the domain for computation. Adapting a region and after initialization patching the region with air or water vf=1. BC for the open top is pressure outlet. I hope it can help.

March 22, 2010, 23:42
#3
New Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 9
Quote:
 Originally Posted by George Chen 28 as far as I understood your case, you made a mistake. It seems that you create a interface between air and water. If so, that's wrong. You should use VOF model and all of the tank will be the domain for computation. Adapting a region and after initialization patching the region with air or water vf=1. BC for the open top is pressure outlet. I hope it can help.
Hi George,

I can see your approach--allow some extra computational domain and patch it with air initially, would solve the bc issue. However, there is still a mass flux of the species across the air-water interface, isn't it? In that case, the mass can not be conserved.

Regards,

Fiona

 March 23, 2010, 04:15 #4 New Member   Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 22 Rep Power: 9 sorry, I don't understand your case. what is your model for?

 March 23, 2010, 11:27 #5 New Member   Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 9 I'm modeling the mixing time through a passive scalar model.

 Tags boundary conditions, multiphase flow

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Saturn CFX 48 October 25, 2017 06:07 murali CFX 5 August 3, 2012 08:56 smn CFX 5 November 24, 2009 07:37 Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05 Anjum Naveed FLUENT 7 August 14, 2006 12:25

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05.