CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Moving fluid vs moving body

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By lovecraft22
  • 1 Post By sbaffini

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 7, 2010, 16:59
Default Moving fluid vs moving body
  #1
Senior Member
 
lore
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 460
Rep Power: 18
lovecraft22 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lovecraft22
Hi everybody, I have a question for you:
every time I run a simulation the fluid is moving while the body is still. That means that the situation is similar to the one you would find in a wind tunnel with all it's disadvantages.
So I was thinking about moving the body while the rest of the domain is still. The ground should be a wall if the body is a car and the other domain faces could be simmetry plane or a pressure condition could be imposed on them.

Would it be a good idea? Is there something I'm missing? What do you think?

Thanx


Lorenzo
lovecraft22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2010, 18:04
Default
  #2
Member
 
kdrbrk's Avatar
 
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17
kdrbrk is on a distinguished road
Lorenzo,

In order to eliminate boundary layer of the ground(wall which is under the car) while flow is moving, I give the ground "velocity inlet" boundary condition with "magnitude and direction" option. Also except symmetry plane and outflow, everywhere is velocity inlet.
By this way, I think I get a good approach like the real world.
Hope it makes sense to you.
kdrbrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2010, 04:58
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
lore
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 460
Rep Power: 18
lovecraft22 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lovecraft22
Yess, that's what I do as well. I was just wondering which would be the difference between setting a case like you described and setting one like I described.
lovecraft22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2020, 15:01
Default
  #4
Member
 
Hector
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 16
hectorgabriel85 is on a distinguished road
Hi, I was wondering if somebody else has another explanation.
hectorgabriel85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2020, 18:47
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
lore
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 460
Rep Power: 18
lovecraft22 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lovecraft22
Moving the body carries the drawback that you need to rebuild the volume mesh in the wake of the vehicle and this comes at a price. You would also need to refine the mesh in front of the vehicle as it passes by.
hectorgabriel85 likes this.
lovecraft22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2020, 19:29
Default
  #6
Member
 
Hector
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 16
hectorgabriel85 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecraft22 View Post
Moving the body carries the drawback that you need to rebuild the volume mesh in the wake of the vehicle and this comes at a price. You would also need to refine the mesh in front of the vehicle as it passes by.
I agree when we see it as a transient problem with moving boundaries: body moves with respect to control volume and remeshing is needed.

What if we see it as a stationary problem? A body fixed in space with respect to control volume as usual (so no remeshing is needed) with the unusual boundary condition: velocity prescribed on the boundary of the body as movingWallVelocity.
hectorgabriel85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2020, 03:42
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
lore
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 460
Rep Power: 18
lovecraft22 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to lovecraft22
No, that would not work as movingWall is only a surface condition that has an impact on the air that wets the surface. I believe the only case where that would work is a zero thickness flat plate moving parallel to the flow at 0° angle of attack.
lovecraft22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2020, 18:28
Default
  #8
Member
 
Hector
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 16
hectorgabriel85 is on a distinguished road
I wish I had the time to check this in OpenFOAM: solve two laminar small problems with same mesh: first one with moving fluid and second one with moving body and compare pressure and viscous forces over body.
hectorgabriel85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2020, 18:42
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 2,190
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 39
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
There are differences, because numerical schemes are not perfect
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...BhO1xuW13jHUkb
hectorgabriel85 likes this.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
application part of laminar newtonian fluid past bluff body swamysrikanth Main CFD Forum 0 December 15, 2009 02:53
applications of laminar newtonian fluid past a bluff body swamysrikanth FLUENT 0 December 15, 2009 02:51
how to accelerate fluid in bluff body case? Rui Main CFD Forum 7 March 5, 2009 11:45
Moving a rigid body in a fluid doum OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 April 4, 2007 10:09
Heat transfer to fluid and pipe body Chris FLUENT 1 December 28, 2002 03:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12.