# Poisson solver

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 18, 2004, 11:54 Poisson solver #1 Steve Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi, I am writing a code for solving viscous incompressible flows using Navier Stokes equations in (u,v,p). Using normal cartesian non-staggered grid. I am using the fractional step method, so I will be solving for intermediate velocities and then a pressure Poisson equation to get the new velocities. Presently I am using the point by point SOR method for my Poisson solver. I would like to ask what Poisson solution method would be better, if I am still required to solve on point-by-point basis. I am thinking of using conjugate gradient, and for my code, multigrid method is not advisable. Another thing is, for conjugate gradient, do I need to include my boundary equations in Ax=b ?? Thanks a lot!!

 June 18, 2004, 14:56 Re: Poisson solver #2 agg Guest   Posts: n/a You will have to include boundary equations in Ax=b. This will make your matrix A asymmetric. For this you should use the bi-conjugate gradient method.

 June 24, 2004, 04:20 Re: Poisson solver #3 Steven Guest   Posts: n/a Ok, great, thanks! Is it necesary to include a preconditioner?

 June 24, 2004, 14:31 Re: Poisson solver #4 agg Guest   Posts: n/a Preconditioning is used to accelerate convergence. If your convergence is slow it would be worthwhile using it since you will be solving Poisson equation in every time step.

 June 28, 2004, 06:06 Re: Poisson solver #5 Steve Guest   Posts: n/a Any recomendations for a preconditioner? I tried without one and one with the Jacobi precond under NEUMANN boundary conditions for a Poisson problem of f=cos(0.5pi x)cos(0.5pi y). But I couldn't derive machine zero convergence for both methods. Any particular reason why? I am using a meshfree method, so it would be advisable for me to implement a precond that doesn't require the transpose of the A matrix (in Ax=b) or preferrably something less fanciful...

 June 28, 2004, 11:34 Re: Poisson solver #6 agg Guest   Posts: n/a Since i haven't written any preconditioners myself, I'm sorry I cannot help you in this part. But there should be books on it for help. Regarding machine accuracy, it takes too many iterations to reach, also I cannot reach it most of the time. For second order 5-pt or 7-pt scheme, for my case I find that a tolerance of 1E-8 and 1E-10 do not differ much in the solutions.

 July 22, 2004, 21:16 Re: Poisson solver #7 cregeo Guest   Posts: n/a May I add one question to this thread? For the poisson equation that will turn out to be matrix equation: div(grad(p) = f how can I insert the Neumann boundary conditions into the matrix: = 0 where <,> is inner product and n is a unit normal on the boundary. In a staggered grid, the boundary condition turns out to be as follows usually: p_i = (- n_x * p_(j))/(n_x + n_y) + (-n_y * p(k))/(n_x + n_y) where p_i, p_j, and p_k are the pressure at cell centers and neighbor to each other.. My question is whether I should replace this into the poisson equation modifying the poisson equation without changing the size of the matrix or use the boundary condition as a Lagrange Multiplier? Please help me.. Cregeo

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post qinmaple OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 4 August 10, 2012 11:00 Fuka Main CFD Forum 0 May 11, 2006 11:19 Henrik StrĂ¶m FLUENT 1 October 29, 2005 03:57 billboard Main CFD Forum 3 May 22, 2002 00:07 ji CFX 2 April 4, 2002 05:03