CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

About preconditioning for incompressible flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2004, 11:47
Default About preconditioning for incompressible flow
  #1
zqnwpu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I added a preconditioner in my CFD code which originally is used to solve compressible NS equations. I choose the preconditioning matrix proposed by Jack Edwards,'Pc'

Pc= I - t1*R

t1 = (1-beta**2)(gamma -1)/a_sound_speed**2

R is another Matrix.

I just multiply the Pc with the residul vector before using AF to update the solution, the d_density/dt is even worse than no preconditioning,but the C_l & C_d's history is improved so much! I don't know why,who can give me some advice?Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2004, 16:08
Default Re: About preconditioning for incompressible flow
  #2
Jonas Holdeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What do you use for the "sound speed" of an incompressible fluid?
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2004, 02:24
Default Re: About preconditioning for incompressible flow
  #3
zqnwpu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi: I use a local sound speed a_local**2 = gamma*Pressure/Density.

I still have another question "the local Mach number",how can I get it?

In the code, I use : M_local = V_local / a_free_stream. Is it right?

Should i change it to :

M_local = V_local / a_local
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2004, 09:16
Default Re: About preconditioning for incompressible flow
  #4
Jonas Holdeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The point of my question was to get you to think about what you are doing. The speed of sound in an incompressible material is infinite (as the stiffness of the material increases, the sound speed increases and becomes infinite for an incompressible material with finite density). You divide by the sound speed in your preconditioner, so that term would go to zero. Also Mach number doesn't have much meaning for an incompressible fluid.

That said, one can reasonably approximate the flow of a real compressible fluid by an unreal incompressible FLOW when the Mach number in the compressible flow is sufficiently small (a value less than .3 Mach is commonly accepted) so that there are no large excursions in density such as occur near shocks.

You should reconsider the question of whether the preconditioner you have chosen is appropriate to the mathematical method you are using. The difficulty in answering the questions you are asking provides a clue. The preconditioner was, no doubt, developed based on physical and mathematical reasoning applied to compressible flow. If you cannot find analogous arguments for the incompressible case, then I would suggest looking at alternative preconditioners.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow meter Design CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 08:33
Can OpenFOAM generate flow at the speed of light? Michel_sharp OpenFOAM 6 October 24, 2009 04:09
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
What is the difference between liquid reactive flow and gas reactive flow? James Main CFD Forum 6 May 15, 2009 12:14
transform navier-stokes eq. to euler-eq. pxyz Main CFD Forum 37 July 7, 2006 08:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15.