CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/779-computational-complexity-navier-stokes-equations.html)

 Marco Ellero May 3, 1999 11:41

Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations

Usually , in a simulation of an uncompressible fluid, it used a CFD technique (finite differences, volume,etc..), anyway the physical domain of the fluid is divided in cells. It is also necessary to solve the Poisson equation for the pressure, wich rapresent the most slow calcuus process. I wish to know wich is the dependence of the computational complexity from the number of cells in the domain (N^2,NlogN?) Thanks

 John C. Chien May 3, 1999 12:36

Re: Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations

(1). How do you define the computational complexity? (2). Since it is necessary to study the mesh-independence issue of the solution, the number of cells must be increased in the study. With more cells to solve, it will take longer to compute the flow field. (3). The convergence of the solution depends on the methods used, such as the point-iterative method, the line-iterative method or the direct solution method. It probably depends on the problem itself, I think.

 Marco Ellero May 3, 1999 13:33

Re: Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations

1) I define it so: the number of step wich the machine need to do ( after one time step ) to calculate the pressure in all domain (for every cell). If we want to calculate the pressure in one cell , in a Poisson equation, we need to know the values of pressure on all boundary, yes? For example in a box , I think in the worst case, if we divide the domain in N cells , we shoul need N^2 step for every time step. Maybe this is improved by use of particular techniques. Anyway, isn't there an inferior limit ? I know it depends on the problem, but in a general case of a box where I solve a Poisson equation?

 John C. Chien May 3, 1999 13:58

Re: Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations

(1)For every time step, you have to update the pressure at every cell. Since you have divided the domain into N cells, you have to update the pressure at N cells, right? Why N^2 steps?

 Tareq Al-shaalan May 4, 1999 00:23

Re: Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations

You do not need the pressure on the boundary, if you know teh velocities. it depends on the the method you are using, mostly you could use dp/dn = 0, when teh velocities are known.

 Rashid Faizullin May 5, 1999 21:07

Re: Computational complexity of Navier Stokes equations

If you'll solve your problem in (u,v,w,p) then you should solve Neimann problem for Poissonn equation on every time step i. But if you'll solve in stream functions and etc lang then you should solve Neimann plus Poisonn only one. Of course boundary conditions will be more comlex.

Also you can solve Neimann problem with correction on every time step i: $P^i- \int_{Omega} P^i$ then you will have only CNlogN operations.

 All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03.